Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 15 212573 STE 20 SA
- Status
- NOAC Issued
- Approved
- Submitted
- 25 August 2015
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 24 Mercer St
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 25 August 2015
- Status
- NOAC Issued
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 11 261965 STE 20 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Revised submission for the proposed eighteen storey mixed-use building to replace an existing three-storey commercial - residential building, while preserving its historic brick elevation. Please review the attached covering letter dated March 22, 2019 regarding the contents of the revised submission. This submission addresses comments from Engineering and Construction Services.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Balmain Hotel Group, LP · registration SM26431
Proposed construction staging areas for proposed development at 15-35 Mercer St
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.70
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM26431: Proposed construction staging areas for proposed development at 15-35 Mercer St (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 212573 STE 20 SA at 24 Mercer St: Revised submission for the proposed eighteen storey mixed-use building to replace an existing three-storey commercial - residential building, while preserving its historic brick elevation. Please review the attached covering letter dated March 22, 2019 regarding the contents of the revised submissi… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposed construction staging areas for proposed development at 15-35 Mercer St
Matched fields
- address
- 15-35 MERCER ST
- application_address
- 24 MERCER ST
Madison Homes · registration SM20991
15 - 33 Mercer Street
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM20991: 15 - 33 Mercer Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 212573 STE 20 SA at 24 Mercer St: Revised submission for the proposed eighteen storey mixed-use building to replace an existing three-storey commercial - residential building, while preserving its historic brick elevation. Please review the attached covering letter dated March 22, 2019 regarding the contents of the revised submissi… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 15 - 33 Mercer Street
Matched fields
- address
- 15-33 MERCER ST
- application_address
- 24 MERCER ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 8 communications · 6 meetings · 4 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 4 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 3 | 1 | 9 January 2018 |
| Economic Development & Culture | City staff | 2 | 2 | 26 June 2018 |
| Transportation Services | City staff | 2 | 2 | 26 June 2018 |
| City Planning | City staff | 1 | 1 | 26 June 2018 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.