Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
24 Mercer St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64581, -79.39051
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 22 MERCER ST (2 civic numbers away).
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 10 July 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0682/18TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 25 August 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 212573 STE 20 SANOAC Issued · Approved
- Submitted 23 August 2011Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 11 261965 STE 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0682/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 10 July 2018 | Closed Approved |
| 15 212573 STE 20 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 25 August 2015 | NOAC Issued Approved |
| 11 261965 STE 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 23 August 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
24 Mercer St · Minor variance (MV)
A0682/18TEY · submitted 10 July 2018 · Closed · from registration SM20991 (Madison Homes)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM20991: 15 - 33 Mercer Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0682/18TEY at 24 Mercer St: To modify the redevelopment plan for the 17-storey mixed-use building, approved under Site-specific By-law 1081-2014(OMB), by permitting an additional storey and by permitting mechanical components of the building to exceed the maximum permitted height. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 15 - 33 Mercer Street
Matched fields
- address
- 15-33 MERCER ST
- application_address
- 24 MERCER ST
24 Mercer St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
15 212573 STE 20 SA · submitted 25 August 2015 · NOAC Issued · from registration SM20991 (Madison Homes)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM20991: 15 - 33 Mercer Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 212573 STE 20 SA at 24 Mercer St: Revised submission for the proposed eighteen storey mixed-use building to replace an existing three-storey commercial - residential building, while preserving its historic brick elevation. Please review the attached covering letter dated March 22, 2019 regarding the contents of the revised submissi… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 15 - 33 Mercer Street
Matched fields
- address
- 15-33 MERCER ST
- application_address
- 24 MERCER ST
24 Mercer St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
15 212573 STE 20 SA · submitted 25 August 2015 · NOAC Issued · from registration SM26431 (Balmain Hotel Group, LP)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.70
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM26431: Proposed construction staging areas for proposed development at 15-35 Mercer St (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 212573 STE 20 SA at 24 Mercer St: Revised submission for the proposed eighteen storey mixed-use building to replace an existing three-storey commercial - residential building, while preserving its historic brick elevation. Please review the attached covering letter dated March 22, 2019 regarding the contents of the revised submissi… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposed construction staging areas for proposed development at 15-35 Mercer St
Matched fields
- address
- 15-35 MERCER ST
- application_address
- 24 MERCER ST
24 Mercer St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 261965 STE 20 OZ · submitted 23 August 2011 · Closed · from registration SM20174 (FREED Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM20174: 15 - 33 Mercer Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 261965 STE 20 OZ at 24 Mercer St: The proposed project is a seventeen storey storey 2,848sq ,m. mixed-use commercial/live-work / residential building to replace an existing three-storey commercial - residential building, while preserving its historic brick elevation. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 15 - 33 Mercer Street
Matched fields
- address
- 15-33 MERCER ST
- application_address
- 24 MERCER ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 10
20 lobbied · 261 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | 136 | 100% (n=20) | 0% | 0% | 14% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 261 | 138 | 93% (n=214) | 7% | 5% | 18% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | 1,881 | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.