lobbyTO

Development application · Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)

Development application 15 145642 ESC 38 PL

1325 Danforth Rd

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
23 April 2015
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
1
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
5
0 meetings · 1 office

Application record

Type
Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)
Addresses
1325 Danforth Rd
Ward
Ward 21 · Michael Thompson
Submitted
23 April 2015
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Related file
13 221429 ESC 38 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Part Lot control applicaton for the creation of 86 residential townhouses lots on a new, registered plan of subdivision. Fifteen of the lots would have frontage on Danforth Road and the remaining 71 on Pringdale Gardens Circle. Refer to Site Plan application 13 247189 ESC 38 SA; Rezoning Application 13 221429 ESC 38 SA and Draft Plan of Subdivision Application 13 21433 ESC 38 SB.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 5 communications · 0 meetings · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Ward 38 Scarborough Centre5
Data table· 1 row
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 38 Scarborough CentreMember of council502 February 2015

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), Ward 21

1 lobbied · 1 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide

2 lobbied · 6 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Data table· 4 rows
Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), Ward 21: 1 lobbied and 1 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied1Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied1Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide: 2 lobbied and 6 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied2Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied6Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.