Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 14 266776 STE 22 OZ
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 22 December 2014
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 1 Eglinton Ave E
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Submitted
- 22 December 2014
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 600 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Proposal for a 65 storey mixed use building containing 600 residential units, 8 floors of non-residential uses including office and retail, and 247 parking spaces in a 6-level underground parking garage.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
One Eglinton East Inc. · registration SM23179
Rezoning application for 1 Eglinton Avenue East
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23179: Rezoning application for 1 Eglinton Avenue East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 266776 STE 22 OZ at 1 Eglinton Ave E: Proposal for a 65 storey mixed use building containing 600 residential units, 8 floors of non-residential uses including office and retail, and 247 parking spaces in a 6-level underground parking garage. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Rezoning application for 1 Eglinton Avenue East
Matched fields
- address
- 1 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 1 EGLINTON AVE E
Davpart Inc. · registration SM21499
Planning and Zoning for 1 Eglinton Avenue East
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM21499: Planning and Zoning for 1 Eglinton Avenue East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 266776 STE 22 OZ at 1 Eglinton Ave E: Proposal for a 65 storey mixed use building containing 600 residential units, 8 floors of non-residential uses including office and retail, and 247 parking spaces in a 6-level underground parking garage. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning and Zoning for 1 Eglinton Avenue East
Matched fields
- address
- 1 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 1 EGLINTON AVE E
One Eglinton East Inc. · registration SM21427
1 Eglinton Avenue East - City File No. 14266776STE22OZ
Evidence High confidence · score 1.00
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM21427: 1 Eglinton Avenue East - City File No. 14266776STE22OZ (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 266776 STE 22 OZ at 1 Eglinton Ave E: Proposal for a 65 storey mixed use building containing 600 residential units, 8 floors of non-residential uses including office and retail, and 247 parking spaces in a 6-level underground parking garage. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1 Eglinton Avenue East - City File No. 14266776STE22OZ
- particulars: 1 Eglinton Avenue East - City File No. 14266776STE22OZ
Matched fields
- file_number
- 14 266776 STE 22 OZ
- address
- 1 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 1 EGLINTON AVE E
Notes
The registration names this application's file number.
Lobbying on linked registrations
3 linked registrations · 6 communications · 4 meetings · 3 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 22 St. Paul's | Member of council | 3 | 3 | 7 December 2015 |
| Josh Matlow | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 17 November 2015 |
| Office of Councillor Josh Matlow | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 27 May 2016 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12
44 lobbied · 60 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 44 | 1,925 | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 14% | 0.02 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | 1,799 | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.