Address · Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
1 Eglinton Ave E
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Location
- 43.70658, -79.39777
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 22 St. Paul's | Member of council | 3 | 3 | 7 December 2015 |
| Josh Matlow | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 17 November 2015 |
| Office of Councillor Josh Matlow | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 27 May 2016 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM23179 | One Eglinton East Inc. | 1 Eglinton Avenue East | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 26 May 2016 – 6 July 2017 | 1 |
| SM21499 | Davpart Inc. | 1 Eglinton Avenue East | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 3 March 2015 – 3 March 2017 | 2 |
| SM21427 | One Eglinton East Inc. | 1 Eglinton Avenue East | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 11 February 2015 – 29 December 2019 | 3 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 15 October 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 226191 STE 12 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 15 October 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 226192 STE 12 CDUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 22 December 2014Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 14 266776 STE 22 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 226191 STE 12 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 15 October 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 21 226192 STE 12 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 15 October 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 14 266776 STE 22 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 22 December 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1 Eglinton Ave E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
14 266776 STE 22 OZ · submitted 22 December 2014 · Closed · from registration SM21427 (One Eglinton East Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 1.00
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM21427: 1 Eglinton Avenue East - City File No. 14266776STE22OZ (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 266776 STE 22 OZ at 1 Eglinton Ave E: Proposal for a 65 storey mixed use building containing 600 residential units, 8 floors of non-residential uses including office and retail, and 247 parking spaces in a 6-level underground parking garage. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1 Eglinton Avenue East - City File No. 14266776STE22OZ
- particulars: 1 Eglinton Avenue East - City File No. 14266776STE22OZ
Matched fields
- file_number
- 14 266776 STE 22 OZ
- address
- 1 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 1 EGLINTON AVE E
Notes
The registration names this application's file number.
1 Eglinton Ave E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
14 266776 STE 22 OZ · submitted 22 December 2014 · Closed · from registration SM21499 (Davpart Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM21499: Planning and Zoning for 1 Eglinton Avenue East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 266776 STE 22 OZ at 1 Eglinton Ave E: Proposal for a 65 storey mixed use building containing 600 residential units, 8 floors of non-residential uses including office and retail, and 247 parking spaces in a 6-level underground parking garage. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning and Zoning for 1 Eglinton Avenue East
Matched fields
- address
- 1 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 1 EGLINTON AVE E
1 Eglinton Ave E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
14 266776 STE 22 OZ · submitted 22 December 2014 · Closed · from registration SM23179 (One Eglinton East Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23179: Rezoning application for 1 Eglinton Avenue East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 266776 STE 22 OZ at 1 Eglinton Ave E: Proposal for a 65 storey mixed use building containing 600 residential units, 8 floors of non-residential uses including office and retail, and 247 parking spaces in a 6-level underground parking garage. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Rezoning application for 1 Eglinton Avenue East
Matched fields
- address
- 1 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 1 EGLINTON AVE E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12
32 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 32 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 3% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 12
5 lobbied · 11 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 11 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12
44 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 44 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 14% | 0.02 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.