Development application 14 208177 STE 27 OZ

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

• CentreCourt Developments Inc. · registration SM22089

  175-191 Dundas Street East and 235 Jarvis Street

  Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79

  A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.

  Source records

  • Registration SM22089: 175-191 Dundas Street East and 235 Jarvis Street (Lobbyist Registry)
  • Development application 14 208177 STE 27 OZ at 175 Dundas St E: To allow for the re-zoning of the subeject lands for the constructing of a 47-storey mixed use condo building containing related retail uses on the ground floor and residential uses above. A total of 80 underground parking spaces will be provided for visitors along with 534 bicycle parking spaces f… (Development Applications)

  Matched text

  • particulars: 175-191 Dundas Street East and 235 Jarvis Street

  Matched fields

  address

  175-191 DUNDAS ST E

  application_address

  175 DUNDAS ST E

• Amexon Development Corporation · registration SM21524

  Potential impacts of applications for Zoning By-law Amendment and Official Plan Amendment at 175 Dundas Street East on 225 Jarvis Street and future applications for Zoning By-law Amendment and Offici…

  Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84

  A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.

  Source records

  • Registration SM21524: Potential impacts of applications for Zoning By-law Amendment and Official Plan Amendment at 175 Dundas Street East on 225 Jarvis Street and future applications for Zoning By-law Amendment and Official Plan Amendment at 225 Jarvis Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
  • Development application 14 208177 STE 27 OZ at 175 Dundas St E: To allow for the re-zoning of the subeject lands for the constructing of a 47-storey mixed use condo building containing related retail uses on the ground floor and residential uses above. A total of 80 underground parking spaces will be provided for visitors along with 534 bicycle parking spaces f… (Development Applications)

  Matched text

  • particulars: Potential impacts of applications for Zoning By-law Amendment and Official Plan Amendment at 175 Dundas Street East on 225 Jarvis Street and future applications for Zoning By-law Amendment and Official Plan Amendment at 225 Jarvis Stre…

  Matched fields

  address

  175 DUNDAS ST E

  application_address

  175 DUNDAS ST E

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 4 communications · 3 meetings · 1 office contacted

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

• Amexon Development Corporation
  SM30842 · 10 November 2020 · “175 Dundas Street East”
• CentreCourt
  SM25032 · 13 September 2017 · “181 Dundas Street East.”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.