Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise
175 Dundas St E
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Location
- 43.65696, -79.37430
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 3 | 2 | 28 September 2015 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM30842 | Amexon Development Corporation | 175 Dundas Street East | Planning and Development; Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study; Planning and Developme… | 10 November 2020 – 12 April 2021 | 0 |
| SM21524 | Amexon Development Corporation | 175 Dundas Street East | Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study; Planning and Development Application, Official P… | 9 March 2015 – 28 July 2025 | 3 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 1 September 2017Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 17 226558 STE 27 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 3 March 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 123315 STE 27 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 18 August 2014Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 14 208177 STE 27 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17 226558 STE 27 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 1 September 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 15 123315 STE 27 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 3 March 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 14 208177 STE 27 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 18 August 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
175 Dundas St E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
15 123315 STE 27 SA · submitted 3 March 2015 · Closed · from registration SM22089 (CentreCourt Developments Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22089: 175-191 Dundas Street East and 235 Jarvis Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 123315 STE 27 SA at 175 Dundas St E: To permit the construction of a 50-storey mixed use building containing retail uses on the ground floor and 563 apartments above. A total of 45 underground parking spaces will be provided. A related zoning amendment applicaion was approved by the OMB. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 175-191 Dundas Street East and 235 Jarvis Street
Matched fields
- address
- 175-191 DUNDAS ST E
- application_address
- 175 DUNDAS ST E
175 Dundas St E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
14 208177 STE 27 OZ · submitted 18 August 2014 · Closed · from registration SM21524 (Amexon Development Corporation)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM21524: Potential impacts of applications for Zoning By-law Amendment and Official Plan Amendment at 175 Dundas Street East on 225 Jarvis Street and future applications for Zoning By-law Amendment and Official Plan Amendment at 225 Jarvis Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 208177 STE 27 OZ at 175 Dundas St E: To allow for the re-zoning of the subeject lands for the constructing of a 47-storey mixed use condo building containing related retail uses on the ground floor and residential uses above. A total of 80 underground parking spaces will be provided for visitors along with 534 bicycle parking spaces f… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Potential impacts of applications for Zoning By-law Amendment and Official Plan Amendment at 175 Dundas Street East on 225 Jarvis Street and future applications for Zoning By-law Amendment and Official Plan Amendment at 225 Jarvis Stre…
Matched fields
- address
- 175 DUNDAS ST E
- application_address
- 175 DUNDAS ST E
175 Dundas St E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
14 208177 STE 27 OZ · submitted 18 August 2014 · Closed · from registration SM22089 (CentreCourt Developments Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22089: 175-191 Dundas Street East and 235 Jarvis Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 208177 STE 27 OZ at 175 Dundas St E: To allow for the re-zoning of the subeject lands for the constructing of a 47-storey mixed use condo building containing related retail uses on the ground floor and residential uses above. A total of 80 underground parking spaces will be provided for visitors along with 534 bicycle parking spaces f… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 175-191 Dundas Street East and 235 Jarvis Street
Matched fields
- address
- 175-191 DUNDAS ST E
- application_address
- 175 DUNDAS ST E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13
4 lobbied · 23 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 23 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13
56 lobbied · 128 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 56 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 7% | 0.16 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 128 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 2% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
82 lobbied · 96 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 82 | — | 100% (n=13) | 0% | 11% | 0.15 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 96 | — | 90% (n=14) | 10% | 16% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.