Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 14 204219 STE 20 OZ

1 Concord CityPlace Way; 3 Concord CityPlace Way; 23 Spadina Ave; 380 Bremner Blvd

Ward 10 · Ausma MalikDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 11 August 2014; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 0; 0 meetings · 0 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 1 Concord CityPlace Way; 3 Concord CityPlace Way; 23 Spadina Ave; 380 Bremner Blvd
Ward: Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Submitted: 11 August 2014
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Revised Submission for Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Applications for a mixed-use residential and commercial developmennt with two towers 59 and 69 storeys. Both applications were appealed to the OMB. The OMB approved the zoning by-law amendment (Decision issued November 14, 2016). On July 23, 2018 City Council approved revisions to the proposal in relation to the number of dwelling units, changes to setbacks and Section 37 community benefits.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Concord Adex · registration SM22749
Block 22 - 23 Spadina Avenue Rezoning and Site Plan Issues
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22749: Block 22 - 23 Spadina Avenue Rezoning and Site Plan Issues (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 204219 STE 20 OZ at 23 Spadina Ave: Revised Submission for Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Applications for a mixed-use residential and commercial developmennt with two towers 59 and 69 storeys. Both applications were appealed to the OMB. The OMB approved the zoning by-law amendment (Decision issued November 14, 2016). On July … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Block 22 - 23 Spadina Avenue Rezoning and Site Plan Issues
Matched fields
address
22-23 SPADINA AVE
application_address
23 SPADINA AVE
Concord Adex Developments Limited · registration SM22138
23 Spadina Avenue rezoning
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22138: 23 Spadina Avenue rezoning (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 204219 STE 20 OZ at 23 Spadina Ave: Revised Submission for Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Applications for a mixed-use residential and commercial developmennt with two towers 59 and 69 storeys. Both applications were appealed to the OMB. The OMB approved the zoning by-law amendment (Decision issued November 14, 2016). On July … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 23 Spadina Avenue rezoning
Matched fields
address
23 SPADINA AVE
application_address
23 SPADINA AVE

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

No communications recorded.

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Aird & Berlis LLP1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Concord Adex
SM30165 · 5 June 2020 · “23 Spadina Avenue”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10

88 lobbied · 94 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=7
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied11%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10: 88 lobbied and 94 matched unlobbied applications in 38 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	88	—	100% (n=7)	0%	11%	0.03
Matched, unlobbied	94	—	100% (n=6)	0%	5%	0.01

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.