Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
23 Spadina Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64107, -79.39278
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deputy City Manager Infrastructure & Development | City staff | 1 | 0 | 8 June 2020 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM30165 | Concord Adex | 23 Spadina Avenue | Planning and Development Application, Plan of Condominium; Planning and Development Application, Si… | 5 June 2020 – 1 June 2021 | 1 |
| SM22138 | Concord Adex Developments Limited | 23 Spadina Avenue | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 18 August 2015 – 18 August 2016 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 12 September 2024Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 24 211698 STE 10 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 11 August 2014Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 14 204219 STE 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 11 August 2014Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 14 204227 STE 20 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 211698 STE 10 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 12 September 2024 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 14 204219 STE 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 11 August 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 14 204227 STE 20 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 11 August 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
23 Spadina Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
14 204219 STE 20 OZ · submitted 11 August 2014 · Closed · from registration SM22138 (Concord Adex Developments Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22138: 23 Spadina Avenue rezoning (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 204219 STE 20 OZ at 23 Spadina Ave: Revised Submission for Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Applications for a mixed-use residential and commercial developmennt with two towers 59 and 69 storeys. Both applications were appealed to the OMB. The OMB approved the zoning by-law amendment (Decision issued November 14, 2016). On July … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 23 Spadina Avenue rezoning
Matched fields
- address
- 23 SPADINA AVE
- application_address
- 23 SPADINA AVE
23 Spadina Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
14 204219 STE 20 OZ · submitted 11 August 2014 · Closed · from registration SM22749 (Concord Adex)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22749: Block 22 - 23 Spadina Avenue Rezoning and Site Plan Issues (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 204219 STE 20 OZ at 23 Spadina Ave: Revised Submission for Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Applications for a mixed-use residential and commercial developmennt with two towers 59 and 69 storeys. Both applications were appealed to the OMB. The OMB approved the zoning by-law amendment (Decision issued November 14, 2016). On July … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Block 22 - 23 Spadina Avenue Rezoning and Site Plan Issues
Matched fields
- address
- 22-23 SPADINA AVE
- application_address
- 23 SPADINA AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10
4 lobbied · 25 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 25 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | 1,881 | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.