lobbyTO

Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 14 179177 ESC 40 SA

3445 Sheppard Ave E

Ward 22 · Nick MantasDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page
Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
24 June 2014
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
4
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
49
9 meetings · 5 offices

Application record

Type
Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses
3445 Sheppard Ave E
Ward
Ward 22 · Nick Mantas
Submitted
24 June 2014
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
352 units
Related file
13 180572 ESC 40 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Site Plan Control application to construct 295 residential units in two condominium buildings of 14 and 10 storeys with ground floor commercial uses fronting Sheppard Avenue East and 3 blocks (57 units) of stacked townhouses situated to the rear of the site. A total of 352 residential units, 386 vehicular parking spaces and 287 bike parking spaces are proposed.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

4 linked registrations · 49 communications · 9 meetings · 5 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Ward 4030
  • Ward 40 Scarborough-Agincourt11
  • Senior Constituency Assistant; Councillor Kelly3
  • office of Councillor Ward 403
  • Ward 40 Scarborough-Agincourt1
  • Ward 22 Scarborough-Agincourt1
Data table· 6 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 40Councillor staff30315 October 2015
Ward 40 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council11624 November 2017
Senior Constituency Assistant; Councillor KellyCouncillor staff3021 July 2017
office of Councillor Ward 40Councillor staff306 March 2013
Ward 40 Scarborough-AgincourtCity staff1023 March 2015
Ward 22 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council1011 June 2020

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 22

7 lobbied · 14 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=61
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 22: 7 lobbied and 14 matched unlobbied applications in 5 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied7Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied14Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=61)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,23772797% (n=96)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.