Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 13 257591 STE 22 SA

140 Redpath Ave; 142 Redpath Ave; 144 Redpath Ave; 151 Roehampton Ave; 157 Roehampton Ave; 161 Roehampton Ave; 165 Roehampton Ave; 171 Roehampton Ave; 173 Roehampton Ave

Ward 12 · Josh MatlowDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 28 October 2013; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 2; 1 meeting · 1 office

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 140 Redpath Ave; 142 Redpath Ave; 144 Redpath Ave; 151 Roehampton Ave; 157 Roehampton Ave; 161 Roehampton Ave; 165 Roehampton Ave; 171 Roehampton Ave; 173 Roehampton Ave
Ward: Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
Submitted: 28 October 2013
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 520 units
Related file: 13 257584 STE 22 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Site Plan application for the (WEST TOWER) to demolish the existing single family dwellings, and develop the underutilized site with a 32 storey tower above a 6 storey podium. A total of 520 residential units comprised of 60 bachelor, 359 1 bedroom, 98 two bedroom and 3 four bedroom town houses. The total proposed residential gross floor area is 32, 516 square metres.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Capital Developments · registration SM22230
151, 157, 161, 165, 167, 171, 173 and 177 Roehampton Avenue & 140,142, 144 and Redpath Avenue
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22230: 151, 157, 161, 165, 167, 171, 173 and 177 Roehampton Avenue & 140,142, 144 and Redpath Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 257591 STE 22 SA at 151 Roehampton Ave: Site Plan application for the (WEST TOWER) to demolish the existing single family dwellings, and develop the underutilized site with a 32 storey tower above a 6 storey podium. A total of 520 residential units comprised of 60 bachelor, 359 1 bedroom, 98 two bedroom and 3 four bedroom town houses. Th… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 151, 157, 161, 165, 167, 171, 173 and 177 Roehampton Avenue & 140,142, 144 and Redpath Avenue
Matched fields
address
177 ROEHAMPTON AVE
application_address
173 ROEHAMPTON AVE
CDF Roehampton Inc. · registration SM18707
151 - 173 Roehampton Avenue (Redpath / Roehampton)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.93
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM18707: 151 - 173 Roehampton Avenue (Redpath / Roehampton) (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 257591 STE 22 SA at 151 Roehampton Ave: Site Plan application for the (WEST TOWER) to demolish the existing single family dwellings, and develop the underutilized site with a 32 storey tower above a 6 storey podium. A total of 520 residential units comprised of 60 bachelor, 359 1 bedroom, 98 two bedroom and 3 four bedroom town houses. Th… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 151 - 173 Roehampton Avenue (Redpath / Roehampton)
Matched fields
address
151-173 ROEHAMPTON AVE
application_address
151 ROEHAMPTON AVE

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 2 communications · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 22 St. Paul's1
Ward 22 St. Paul's1

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 22 St. Paul's	Councillor staff	1	0	14 September 2015
Ward 22 St. Paul's	Member of council	1	1	28 September 2015

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Sherman Brown Dryer Karol2 registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12

32 lobbied · 72 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=4
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied3%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12: 32 lobbied and 72 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	32	—	100% (n=4)	0%	3%	0.00
Matched, unlobbied	72	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.05

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.