Address · Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
157 Roehampton Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Location
- 43.70874, -79.39391
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 10 October 2018Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 18 240217 STE 22 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 28 October 2013Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 13 257584 STE 22 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 28 October 2013Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 13 257591 STE 22 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 240217 STE 22 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 10 October 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 13 257584 STE 22 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 28 October 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 13 257591 STE 22 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 28 October 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
151 Roehampton Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
13 257584 STE 22 OZ · submitted 28 October 2013 · Closed · from registration SM18707 (CDF Roehampton Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18707: 151 - 173 Roehampton Avenue (Redpath / Roehampton) (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 257584 STE 22 OZ at 151 Roehampton Ave: This application proposes the construction of a 38-storey mixed-use building at 151, 157, 161, 165, 167, 171, 173, and 177 Roehampton Avenue and 140 144 Redpath Avenue. The proposal consists of a 33-storey residential tower on top of a 5-storey base with 5 townhouse units on Roehampton. There are t… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 151 - 173 Roehampton Avenue (Redpath / Roehampton)
Matched fields
- address
- 151-173 ROEHAMPTON AVE
- application_address
- 151 ROEHAMPTON AVE
151 Roehampton Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
13 257584 STE 22 OZ · submitted 28 October 2013 · Closed · from registration SM22230 (Capital Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22230: 151, 157, 161, 165, 167, 171, 173 and 177 Roehampton Avenue & 140,142, 144 and Redpath Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 257584 STE 22 OZ at 151 Roehampton Ave: This application proposes the construction of a 38-storey mixed-use building at 151, 157, 161, 165, 167, 171, 173, and 177 Roehampton Avenue and 140 144 Redpath Avenue. The proposal consists of a 33-storey residential tower on top of a 5-storey base with 5 townhouse units on Roehampton. There are t… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 151, 157, 161, 165, 167, 171, 173 and 177 Roehampton Avenue & 140,142, 144 and Redpath Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 177 ROEHAMPTON AVE
- application_address
- 177 ROEHAMPTON AVE
151 Roehampton Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
13 257591 STE 22 SA · submitted 28 October 2013 · Closed · from registration SM18707 (CDF Roehampton Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.93
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM18707: 151 - 173 Roehampton Avenue (Redpath / Roehampton) (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 257591 STE 22 SA at 151 Roehampton Ave: Site Plan application for the (WEST TOWER) to demolish the existing single family dwellings, and develop the underutilized site with a 32 storey tower above a 6 storey podium. A total of 520 residential units comprised of 60 bachelor, 359 1 bedroom, 98 two bedroom and 3 four bedroom town houses. Th… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 151 - 173 Roehampton Avenue (Redpath / Roehampton)
Matched fields
- address
- 151-173 ROEHAMPTON AVE
- application_address
- 151 ROEHAMPTON AVE
151 Roehampton Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
13 257591 STE 22 SA · submitted 28 October 2013 · Closed · from registration SM22230 (Capital Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22230: 151, 157, 161, 165, 167, 171, 173 and 177 Roehampton Avenue & 140,142, 144 and Redpath Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 257591 STE 22 SA at 151 Roehampton Ave: Site Plan application for the (WEST TOWER) to demolish the existing single family dwellings, and develop the underutilized site with a 32 storey tower above a 6 storey podium. A total of 520 residential units comprised of 60 bachelor, 359 1 bedroom, 98 two bedroom and 3 four bedroom town houses. Th… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 151, 157, 161, 165, 167, 171, 173 and 177 Roehampton Avenue & 140,142, 144 and Redpath Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 177 ROEHAMPTON AVE
- application_address
- 173 ROEHAMPTON AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 12
5 lobbied · 11 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 11 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12
44 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 44 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 14% | 0.02 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12
32 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 32 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 3% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.