Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 13 247189 ESC 38 SA

Ward 21 · Michael ThompsonDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 7 October 2013; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 6; 1 meeting · 1 office

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 1325 Danforth Rd
Ward: Ward 21 · Michael Thompson
Submitted: 7 October 2013
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Related file: 13 221429 ESC 38 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Proposal for a 86 unit residential townhouse development on a new public road. A mixture of 'through' townhouse units with rear yards, back-to-back townhouses, and townhouse units with rear garages are proposed.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Monarch Corporation · registration SM20144
Draft Plan of Subdivision, Zoning, and Site Plan approval applications re: 1325 Danforth Road in Scarborough (former Pringdale Gardens Public School site).
Evidence High confidence · score 0.93
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM20144: Draft Plan of Subdivision, Zoning, and Site Plan approval applications re: 1325 Danforth Road in Scarborough (former Pringdale Gardens Public School site). (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 247189 ESC 38 SA at 1325 Danforth Rd: Proposal for a 86 unit residential townhouse development on a new public road. A mixture of 'through' townhouse units with rear yards, back-to-back townhouses, and townhouse units with rear garages are proposed. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Draft Plan of Subdivision, Zoning, and Site Plan approval applications re: 1325 Danforth Road in Scarborough (former Pringdale Gardens Public School site).
Matched fields
address
1325 DANFORTH RD
application_address
1325 DANFORTH RD
Monarch COnstruction Limited · registration SM19639
Redevelopment of 1325 Danforth Road
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19639: Redevelopment of 1325 Danforth Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 247189 ESC 38 SA at 1325 Danforth Rd: Proposal for a 86 unit residential townhouse development on a new public road. A mixture of 'through' townhouse units with rear yards, back-to-back townhouses, and townhouse units with rear garages are proposed. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Redevelopment of 1325 Danforth Road
Matched fields
address
1325 DANFORTH RD
application_address
1325 DANFORTH RD

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 6 communications · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 38 Scarborough Centre6

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 38 Scarborough Centre	Member of council	6	1	2 February 2015

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Bousfields Inc.1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 21

10 lobbied · 44 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 21: 10 lobbied and 44 matched unlobbied applications in 9 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	10	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	44	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.