Development application · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
Development application 13 239568 ESC 43 SB
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 20 September 2013
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
- Addresses
- 85 Keeler Blvd
- Ward
- Ward 24 · Paul Ainslie
- Submitted
- 20 September 2013
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 13 239585 ESC 43 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To permit a 51-unit residential subdivision comprised of 25 detached residential lots and 26 semi-detached residential lots and a new 18.5 m wide public street on a former school site.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Laurier Homes (keeler) Inc · registration SM21439
Rezoning and Subdivision application for 85 Keeler Boulevard
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM21439: Rezoning and Subdivision application for 85 Keeler Boulevard (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 239568 ESC 43 SB at 85 Keeler Blvd: To permit a 51-unit residential subdivision comprised of 25 detached residential lots and 26 semi-detached residential lots and a new 18.5 m wide public street on a former school site. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Rezoning and Subdivision application for 85 Keeler Boulevard
Matched fields
- address
- 85 KEELER BLVD
- application_address
- 85 KEELER BLVD
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 5 communications · 0 meetings · 5 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 5 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 35 Scarborough Southwest | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 17 February 2015 |
| Ward 36 Scarborough Southwest | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 17 February 2015 |
| Ward 37 Scarborough Centre | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 17 February 2015 |
| Ward 40 Scarborough-Agincourt | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 17 February 2015 |
| Ward 42 Scarborough-Rouge River | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 17 February 2015 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Laurier Homes LimitedSM21396 · 5 February 2015 · “85 Keeler Blvd”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.