lobbyTO

Address · Ward 24 · Paul Ainslie

85 Keeler Blvd

Registrations naming this address
2
2 client organisations
Communications on those registrations
8
7 offices contacted
Applications at this address
1
1 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items
0
Items naming this address

About this address

Ward
Ward 24 · Paul Ainslie
Location
43.79346, -79.20440
How this address was located
Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 84 KEELER BLVD (1 civic numbers away).

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

2

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

  • Ward 38 Scarborough Centre2
  • Ward 35 Scarborough Southwest1
  • Ward 36 Scarborough Southwest1
  • Ward 37 Scarborough Centre1
  • Ward 40 Scarborough-Agincourt1
  • Ward 42 Scarborough-Rouge River1
  • Ward 43 Scarborough East1
Data table· 7 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 38 Scarborough CentreMember of council2210 February 2015
Ward 35 Scarborough SouthwestMember of council1017 February 2015
Ward 36 Scarborough SouthwestMember of council1017 February 2015
Ward 37 Scarborough CentreMember of council1017 February 2015
Ward 40 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council1017 February 2015
Ward 42 Scarborough-Rouge RiverMember of council1017 February 2015
Ward 43 Scarborough EastMember of council1012 February 2015
All registrations· 2 rows
RegistrationClientAs writtenSubject matterDatesCommunications
SM21439Laurier Homes (keeler) Inc85 Keeler BoulevardPlanning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Plan of …16 February 2015 – 30 April 20155
SM21396Laurier Homes Limited85 Keeler BlvdPlanning and Development Application, Zoning By-law5 February 2015 – 31 July 20183

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

1
Data table· 1 row
ApplicationTypeSubmittedStatus
13 239568 ESC 43 SB
Development application
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)20 September 2013Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide

16 lobbied · 48 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Data table· 2 rows
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide: 16 lobbied and 48 matched unlobbied applications in 15 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied16Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied48Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.