lobbyTO

Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 13 201956 WET 11 SA

150 Symes Rd

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
10 July 2013
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
2
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
7
1 meeting · 3 offices

Application record

Type
Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses
150 Symes Rd
Ward
Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
Submitted
10 July 2013
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Related file
13 201931 WET 11 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Proposed redevelopment of a largely vacant and underutilized brownfield site for an urban employment campus featuring a wide range of employment uses (three new buildings). Adaptive re-use of a historic building (former City waste transfer station known as the Symes Road.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 7 communications · 1 meeting · 3 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Councillor Nunziata5
  • F. Nunziata1
  • Ward 11 York South-Weston1
Data table· 3 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Councillor NunziataCouncillor staff5022 August 2014
F. NunziataCouncillor staff1012 December 2013
Ward 11 York South-WestonMember of council1127 February 2013

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 5

15 lobbied · 40 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=63
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 5: 15 lobbied and 40 matched unlobbied applications in 12 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied15Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied40Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=63)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,236—97% (n=98)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.