Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 13 201956 WET 11 SA
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 10 July 2013
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 150 Symes Rd
- Ward
- Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
- Submitted
- 10 July 2013
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 13 201931 WET 11 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Proposed redevelopment of a largely vacant and underutilized brownfield site for an urban employment campus featuring a wide range of employment uses (three new buildings). Adaptive re-use of a historic building (former City waste transfer station known as the Symes Road.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Symesbridge Inc. · registration SM19926
Applications have been filed for technical zoning changes to 150 Symes Rd which is currently the subject to the former City of York and the existing city of Toronto by-laws. The OPA work relates to t…
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19926: Applications have been filed for technical zoning changes to 150 Symes Rd which is currently the subject to the former City of York and the existing city of Toronto by-laws. The OPA work relates to the MCR. There is a heritage building on the site. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 201956 WET 11 SA at 150 Symes Rd: Proposed redevelopment of a largely vacant and underutilized brownfield site for an urban employment campus featuring a wide range of employment uses (three new buildings). Adaptive re-use of a historic building (former City waste transfer station known as the Symes Road. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Applications have been filed for technical zoning changes to 150 Symes Rd which is currently the subject to the former City of York and the existing city of Toronto by-laws. The OPA work relate…
Matched fields
- address
- 150 SYMES RD
- application_address
- 150 SYMES RD
Ehrlich Asset Management Inc. · registration SM18990
Redevelopment of 150 Symes Rd.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18990: Redevelopment of 150 Symes Rd. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 201956 WET 11 SA at 150 Symes Rd: Proposed redevelopment of a largely vacant and underutilized brownfield site for an urban employment campus featuring a wide range of employment uses (three new buildings). Adaptive re-use of a historic building (former City waste transfer station known as the Symes Road. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Redevelopment of 150 Symes Rd.
Matched fields
- address
- 150 SYMES RD
- application_address
- 150 SYMES RD
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 7 communications · 1 meeting · 3 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Councillor Nunziata | Councillor staff | 5 | 0 | 22 August 2014 |
| F. Nunziata | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 12 December 2013 |
| Ward 11 York South-Weston | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 27 February 2013 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- 2515306 Ontario Inc.SM26346 · 11 June 2018 · “150 Symes Road”
- 2515306 Ontario Inc.SM26313 · 8 June 2018 · “150 Symes Road”
- Symesbridge Inc.SM23733 · 14 November 2016 · “150 Symes Road”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 5
15 lobbied · 40 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 15 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 40 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.