Address · Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
150 Symes Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
- Location
- 43.67336, -79.47861
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
5These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 7 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Councillor Nunziata | Councillor staff | 5 | 0 | 22 August 2014 |
| Ward 11 York South-Weston | Member of council | 5 | 4 | 12 June 2018 |
| Frances Nunziata | Councillor staff | 4 | 1 | 19 July 2018 |
| F. Nunziata | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 12 December 2013 |
| Mayor Tory | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 12 June 2018 |
| Mayor's Office | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 12 June 2018 |
| Office of Councillor Nunziata, Ward 11 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 12 June 2018 |
All registrations· 5 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM26346 | 2515306 Ontario Inc. | 150 Symes Road | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 11 June 2018 – 31 December 2018 | 3 |
| SM26313 | 2515306 Ontario Inc. | 150 Symes Road | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 8 June 2018 – 7 December 2018 | 6 |
| SM23733 | Symesbridge Inc. | 150 Symes Road | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 14 November 2016 – 14 November 2017 | 2 |
| SM19926 | Symesbridge Inc. | 150 Symes Rd | Planning and Development, Heritage; Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning a… | 12 December 2013 – 12 December 2014 | 6 |
| SM18990 | Ehrlich Asset Management Inc. | 150 Symes Rd. | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 27 February 2013 – 27 June 2013 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
5- Submitted 14 April 2023Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 23 134151 WET 05 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 16 January 2018Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 18 105853 WET 11 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 28 August 2015Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0060/15EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 10 July 2013Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 13 201931 WET 11 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 10 July 2013Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 13 201956 WET 11 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 5 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23 134151 WET 05 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 14 April 2023 | Under Review In progress |
| 18 105853 WET 11 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 16 January 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| B0060/15EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 28 August 2015 | Closed Approved |
| 13 201931 WET 11 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 10 July 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 13 201956 WET 11 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 10 July 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
150 Symes Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
18 105853 WET 11 OZ · submitted 16 January 2018 · Closed · from registration SM26313 (2515306 Ontario Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM26313: Application to lift a holding provision to allow outdoor patios at 150 Symes Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 105853 WET 11 OZ at 150 Symes Rd: Application submitted to lift the Holding Symbol "H" as to permit an outdoor rooftop patio of 250 square metres on the site. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Application to lift a holding provision to allow outdoor patios at 150 Symes Road
Matched fields
- address
- 150 SYMES RD
- application_address
- 150 SYMES RD
150 Symes Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
18 105853 WET 11 OZ · submitted 16 January 2018 · Closed · from registration SM26346 (2515306 Ontario Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM26346: Application to lift a holding provision to allow an outdoor patio at 150 Symes Road, Toronto. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 105853 WET 11 OZ at 150 Symes Rd: Application submitted to lift the Holding Symbol "H" as to permit an outdoor rooftop patio of 250 square metres on the site. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Application to lift a holding provision to allow an outdoor patio at 150 Symes Road, Toronto.
Matched fields
- address
- 150 SYMES RD
- application_address
- 150 SYMES RD
150 Symes Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
13 201931 WET 11 OZ · submitted 10 July 2013 · Closed · from registration SM19926 (Symesbridge Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19926: Applications have been filed for technical zoning changes to 150 Symes Rd which is currently the subject to the former City of York and the existing city of Toronto by-laws. The OPA work relates to the MCR. There is a heritage building on the site. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 201931 WET 11 OZ at 150 Symes Rd: This application proposes to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-laws (City-wide Zoning By-law No. 569-2013, former City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 438-86 and former City of York Zoning By-law No. 1-83) to permit additional potentially sensitive non-residential uses on the lands at 150 Symes Ro… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Applications have been filed for technical zoning changes to 150 Symes Rd which is currently the subject to the former City of York and the existing city of Toronto by-laws. The OPA work relate…
Matched fields
- address
- 150 SYMES RD
- application_address
- 150 SYMES RD
150 Symes Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
13 201956 WET 11 SA · submitted 10 July 2013 · Closed · from registration SM18990 (Ehrlich Asset Management Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18990: Redevelopment of 150 Symes Rd. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 201956 WET 11 SA at 150 Symes Rd: Proposed redevelopment of a largely vacant and underutilized brownfield site for an urban employment campus featuring a wide range of employment uses (three new buildings). Adaptive re-use of a historic building (former City waste transfer station known as the Symes Road. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Redevelopment of 150 Symes Rd.
Matched fields
- address
- 150 SYMES RD
- application_address
- 150 SYMES RD
150 Symes Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
13 201956 WET 11 SA · submitted 10 July 2013 · Closed · from registration SM19926 (Symesbridge Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19926: Applications have been filed for technical zoning changes to 150 Symes Rd which is currently the subject to the former City of York and the existing city of Toronto by-laws. The OPA work relates to the MCR. There is a heritage building on the site. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 201956 WET 11 SA at 150 Symes Rd: Proposed redevelopment of a largely vacant and underutilized brownfield site for an urban employment campus featuring a wide range of employment uses (three new buildings). Adaptive re-use of a historic building (former City waste transfer station known as the Symes Road. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Applications have been filed for technical zoning changes to 150 Symes Rd which is currently the subject to the former City of York and the existing city of Toronto by-laws. The OPA work relate…
Matched fields
- address
- 150 SYMES RD
- application_address
- 150 SYMES RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 5
15 lobbied · 40 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 15 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 40 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 5
12 lobbied · 17 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 5
1 lobbied · 17 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.