Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 13 173064 NNY 34 SA
40 Moccasin Trl; 50 Green Belt Dr
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 23 May 2013
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 40 Moccasin Trl; 50 Green Belt Dr
- Ward
- Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
- Submitted
- 23 May 2013
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 324 units
- Related file
- 13 173059 NNY 34 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Proposal is for 324 new residential dwelling units with 4 levels of underground parking
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Hampton Metrix · registration SM16184
Development application to permit more intensive residential uses on site; mix of rental and condo; 40 Moccasin Trail and 50-60 Greenbelt Drive
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM16184: Development application to permit more intensive residential uses on site; mix of rental and condo; 40 Moccasin Trail and 50-60 Greenbelt Drive (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 173064 NNY 34 SA at 40 Moccasin Trl: Proposal is for 324 new residential dwelling units with 4 levels of underground parking (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development application to permit more intensive residential uses on site; mix of rental and condo; 40 Moccasin Trail and 50-60 Greenbelt Drive
Matched fields
- address
- 40 MOCCASIN TRL
- application_address
- 40 MOCCASIN TRL
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 2 communications · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLS | City staff | 2 | 1 | 22 August 2011 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 16
10 lobbied · 23 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 23 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.