Address · Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
40 Moccasin Trl
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
- Location
- 43.73047, -79.33692
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLS | City staff | 2 | 1 | 22 August 2011 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM16184 | Hampton Metrix | 40 Moccasin Trail | Licences / Licensing; Planning and Development, Rental Housing Demolition or Conversion; Planning a… | 20 April 2011 – 3 May 2016 | 2 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 23 May 2013Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 13 173059 NNY 34 OZOMB Approved · Approved
- Submitted 23 May 2013Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 13 173064 NNY 34 SAUnder Review · In progress
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 173059 NNY 34 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 23 May 2013 | OMB Approved Approved |
| 13 173064 NNY 34 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 23 May 2013 | Under Review In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
40 Moccasin Trl · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
13 173059 NNY 34 OZ · submitted 23 May 2013 · OMB Approved · from registration SM16184 (Hampton Metrix)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM16184: Development application to permit more intensive residential uses on site; mix of rental and condo; 40 Moccasin Trail and 50-60 Greenbelt Drive (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 173059 NNY 34 OZ at 40 Moccasin Trl: Official Plan Amendment (OPA) and Zoning By-law Amendment (ZBA) application for the redevelopment of the lands with an eight (8)-storey residential apartment building with 194 rental units (East Block) and a four (4)-storey residential apartment building with 100 rental units (West Block) (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development application to permit more intensive residential uses on site; mix of rental and condo; 40 Moccasin Trail and 50-60 Greenbelt Drive
Matched fields
- address
- 40 MOCCASIN TRL
- application_address
- 40 MOCCASIN TRL
40 Moccasin Trl · Site Plan Approval (SA)
13 173064 NNY 34 SA · submitted 23 May 2013 · Under Review · from registration SM16184 (Hampton Metrix)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM16184: Development application to permit more intensive residential uses on site; mix of rental and condo; 40 Moccasin Trail and 50-60 Greenbelt Drive (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 173064 NNY 34 SA at 40 Moccasin Trl: Site Plan application for the redevelopment of the lands with an eight (8)-storey residential apartment building with 194 rental units (East Block) and a four (4)-storey residential apartment building with 100 rental units (West Block) (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development application to permit more intensive residential uses on site; mix of rental and condo; 40 Moccasin Trail and 50-60 Greenbelt Drive
Matched fields
- address
- 40 MOCCASIN TRL
- application_address
- 40 MOCCASIN TRL
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 16
4 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 16
10 lobbied · 23 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 23 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.