Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 13 126666 STE 27 OZ
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 28 February 2013
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 21 Avenue Rd
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Submitted
- 28 February 2013
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 803 units
- Related file
- 11 332281 STE 27 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
An Official Plan (File No. 13 126666 STE 27 OZ) and Zoning By-law Amendment (11 332281 STE 27 OZ) Applications to retain and convert the 31-storey (93 metres tall, plus a 7-metre mechanical penthouse) former Four Seasons Hotel into a mixed-use building; to construct a new 38-storey (120 metres tall, plus a metre mechanical penthouse sloping in height from 2 to 5 metres) mixed-use tower at the corner of Avenue Road and Cumberland Street, and a new 10-storey (40.5 metre tall, plus a 5 metre mechanical penthouse) building along Yorkville Avenue, east of the existing 31-storey building. In total, 803 residential units are proposed. A total of 363 parking spaces are proposed (294 residential spaces, 4 car share spaces, and 65 commercial spaces within a commercial parking garage) to be provided in a five-level below-grade parking garage.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Felcorp · registration SM18244
21 Avenue Rd, Toronto
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18244: 21 Avenue Rd, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 126666 STE 27 OZ at 21 Avenue Rd: An Official Plan (File No. 13 126666 STE 27 OZ) and Zoning By-law Amendment (11 332281 STE 27 OZ) Applications to retain and convert the 31-storey (93 metres tall, plus a 7-metre mechanical penthouse) former Four Seasons Hotel into a mixed-use building; to construct a new 38-storey (120 metres tall… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 21 Avenue Rd, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 21 AVENUE RD
- application_address
- 21 AVENUE RD
Yorkville/Cumberland Neighbourhood Coalition · registration SM17934
Yorkville/Cumberland Neighbourhood Coalition (YCNC)re 21 Avenue Road, Toronto
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17934: Yorkville/Cumberland Neighbourhood Coalition (YCNC)re 21 Avenue Road, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 126666 STE 27 OZ at 21 Avenue Rd: An Official Plan (File No. 13 126666 STE 27 OZ) and Zoning By-law Amendment (11 332281 STE 27 OZ) Applications to retain and convert the 31-storey (93 metres tall, plus a 7-metre mechanical penthouse) former Four Seasons Hotel into a mixed-use building; to construct a new 38-storey (120 metres tall… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Yorkville/Cumberland Neighbourhood Coalition (YCNC)re 21 Avenue Road, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 21 AVENUE RD
- application_address
- 21 AVENUE RD
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 7 communications · 3 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 7 | 3 | 6 April 2013 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Cumberland Yorkville Neighbourhood CoalitionSM18292 · 25 July 2012 · “21 Avenue Road.”
- Friends of YorkvilleSM14024 · 20 January 2010 · “21 Avenue Road.”
- MTCC 626, MTCC 1276, 130 Bloor KS Inc., Standard Toronto Condominium Corporation 1920SM13628 · 22 October 2009 · “21 Avenue Road”
- Camrost-FeldcorpSM11216 · 11 February 2008 · “21 Avenue Road”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11
69 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=10) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.