Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 13 111005 STE 14 SA
1090 King St W; 1100 King St W
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 24 January 2013
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 1090 King St W; 1100 King St W
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 24 January 2013
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 506 units
- Related file
- 11 210449 STE 14 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Application for Site Plan Approval to permit the development of two mixed-use buildings (Buildings A and B) comprised of four levels of underground parking, including 737 vehicle parking spaces, non-residential uses at the ground, 2nd, and part of the 3rd floors, and a total of 506 residential units. Building A is composed of 2 tower elements, the first having at a height of 19 storeys towards the north end of the site and sloping to 13 storeys closer to King Street West, the second at a height of 14 storeys. A 7-storey podium links to two tower elements of Building A fronting King Street West. Building B is a 12-story building with non residential space on the first three floors and residential units above. A new bike path situated adjacent to the rail corridor north of the building is proposed to connect Joe Shuster Way to Liberty Village.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
King Liberty North Corporation · registration SM19634
1100 King Street West
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19634: 1100 King Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 111005 STE 14 SA at 1100 King St W: Application for Site Plan Approval to permit the development of two mixed-use buildings (Buildings A and B) comprised of four levels of underground parking, including 737 vehicle parking spaces, non-residential uses at the ground, 2nd, and part of the 3rd floors, and a total of 506 residential unit… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1100 King Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 1100 KING ST W
- application_address
- 1100 KING ST W
URBANCORP DEVELOPMENTS INC · registration SM17356
1100 KING ST WEST REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17356: 1100 KING ST WEST REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 111005 STE 14 SA at 1100 King St W: Application for Site Plan Approval to permit the development of two mixed-use buildings (Buildings A and B) comprised of four levels of underground parking, including 737 vehicle parking spaces, non-residential uses at the ground, 2nd, and part of the 3rd floors, and a total of 506 residential unit… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1100 KING ST WEST REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
Matched fields
- address
- 1100 KING ST W
- application_address
- 1100 KING ST W
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 2 communications · 2 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 14 Parkdale-High Park | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 9 September 2013 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- First Capital REITSM29707 · 4 February 2020 · “1100 King St. W”
- First capital RealtySM27571 · 5 February 2019 · “1100 King St. W”
- King Liberty North CorporationSM27109 · 30 November 2018 · “1100 King Street West”
- UrbancorpSM19119 · 21 March 2013 · “1100 King Street West”
- Kilmer Brownfield Management LimitedSM12642 · 8 January 2009 · “1100 King Street W”
- UrbancorpSM11342 · 7 March 2008 · “1100 King Street West.”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | 1,881 | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.