Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
1100 King St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64012, -79.42224
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
8These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 5 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 10 Spadina-Fort York | Member of council | 8 | 6 | 3 March 2020 |
| Mayor John Tory | Councillor staff | 3 | 0 | 27 February 2020 |
| Councillor Stephen Holyday | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 15 April 2020 |
| Joe Cressy | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 27 January 2021 |
| Ward 14 Parkdale-High Park | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 9 September 2013 |
All registrations· 8 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM29707 | First Capital REIT | 1100 King St. W | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 4 February 2020 – 11 August 2021 | 5 |
| SM27571 | First capital Realty | 1100 King St. W | Transportation - Metrolinx; Transportation - Roads / Bridges | 5 February 2019 – 31 December 2026 | 6 |
| SM27109 | King Liberty North Corporation | 1100 King Street West | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 30 November 2018 – 9 July 2025 | 4 |
| SM19634 | King Liberty North Corporation | 1100 King Street West | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 4 September 2013 – 11 June 2014 | 2 |
| SM19119 | Urbancorp | 1100 King Street West | Water | 21 March 2013 – 21 March 2014 | 0 |
| SM17356 | URBANCORP DEVELOPMENTS INC | 1100 KING ST WEST | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 20 October 2011 – 21 October 2013 | 0 |
| SM12642 | Kilmer Brownfield Management Limited | 1100 King Street W | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 8 January 2009 – 8 January 2010 | 0 |
| SM11342 | Urbancorp | 1100 King Street West. | Planning Application/Zoning By-Law- | 7 March 2008 – 3 September 2013 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
6- Submitted 4 July 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0721/19TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 2 October 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1063/17TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 20 January 2017Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0011/17TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 22 January 2014Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 14 108027 STE 14 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 24 January 2013Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 13 111005 STE 14 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 16 December 2011Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 11 327555 STE 14 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 6 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0721/19TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 4 July 2019 | Closed Approved |
| A1063/17TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 2 October 2017 | Closed Approved |
| B0011/17TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 20 January 2017 | Closed Approved |
| 14 108027 STE 14 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 22 January 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 13 111005 STE 14 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 24 January 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 327555 STE 14 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 16 December 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1100 King St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
13 111005 STE 14 SA · submitted 24 January 2013 · Closed · from registration SM17356 (URBANCORP DEVELOPMENTS INC)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17356: 1100 KING ST WEST REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 111005 STE 14 SA at 1100 King St W: Application for Site Plan Approval to permit the development of two mixed-use buildings (Buildings A and B) comprised of four levels of underground parking, including 737 vehicle parking spaces, non-residential uses at the ground, 2nd, and part of the 3rd floors, and a total of 506 residential unit… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1100 KING ST WEST REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
Matched fields
- address
- 1100 KING ST W
- application_address
- 1100 KING ST W
1100 King St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
13 111005 STE 14 SA · submitted 24 January 2013 · Closed · from registration SM19634 (King Liberty North Corporation)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19634: 1100 King Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 111005 STE 14 SA at 1100 King St W: Application for Site Plan Approval to permit the development of two mixed-use buildings (Buildings A and B) comprised of four levels of underground parking, including 737 vehicle parking spaces, non-residential uses at the ground, 2nd, and part of the 3rd floors, and a total of 506 residential unit… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1100 King Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 1100 KING ST W
- application_address
- 1100 KING ST W
1100 King St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 327555 STE 14 OZ · submitted 16 December 2011 · Closed · from registration SM17356 (URBANCORP DEVELOPMENTS INC)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17356: 1100 KING ST WEST REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 327555 STE 14 OZ at 1100 King St W: Propsal to lift the hold on the most Westerly portion of the east lot (20 Joe Shuster Way) of the lands in order that they may be developed with a 14 storey mixed use condominium complete with ground floor and below grade commercial. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1100 KING ST WEST REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
Matched fields
- address
- 1100 KING ST W
- application_address
- 1100 KING ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 10
20 lobbied · 261 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | 136 | 100% (n=20) | 0% | 0% | 14% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 261 | 138 | 93% (n=214) | 7% | 5% | 18% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 10% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.