Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 12 191650 STE 27 OZ

26 Cumberland St; 26-32 Cumberland St; 27 Yorkville Ave; 27-29 Yorkville Ave; 37 Yorkville Ave; 50 Cumberland St

Ward 11 · Dianne SaxeDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 12 June 2012; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 6; 4 meetings · 2 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 26 Cumberland St; 26-32 Cumberland St; 27 Yorkville Ave; 27-29 Yorkville Ave; 37 Yorkville Ave; 50 Cumberland St
Ward: Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
Submitted: 12 June 2012
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 1,100 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

To construct a mixed-use development with a podium building and a 40 and 62-storey towers. A total of 1100 dwelling units are proposed, and the ground floor of the podium will be non-residential uses. A total of 1136 parking spaces will be provided below grade and above grade including an 800 Toronto Parking Authority facility.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Minto Urban Communities · registration SM17280
37 YORKVILLE AVENUE & 50 CUMBERLAND STREET
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17280: 37 YORKVILLE AVENUE & 50 CUMBERLAND STREET (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 191650 STE 27 OZ at 27 Yorkville Ave: To construct a mixed-use development with a podium building and a 40 and 62-storey towers. A total of 1100 dwelling units are proposed, and the ground floor of the podium will be non-residential uses. A total of 1136 parking spaces will be provided below grade and above grade including an 800 Toron… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 37 YORKVILLE AVENUE & 50 CUMBERLAND STREET
Matched fields
address
37 YORKVILLE AVE
application_address
37 YORKVILLE AVE

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 6 communications · 4 meetings · 2 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale5
271

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale	Member of council	5	3	23 July 2014
27	Councillor staff	1	1	19 February 2015

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Sherman Brown Dryer Karol1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Kingsett Capital
SM24823 · 7 July 2017 · “37 Yorkville Avenue”
Minto Communities Inc.
SM20950 · 6 October 2014 · “37 Yorkville Avenue”
Empire Restaurant
SM15550 · 10 December 2010 · “50 Cumberland Street”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11

69 lobbied · 60 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=10
Matched, unlobbied100% n=4

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied10%
Matched, unlobbied11%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11: 69 lobbied and 60 matched unlobbied applications in 31 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	69	—	100% (n=10)	0%	10%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	60	—	100% (n=4)	0%	11%	0.03

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.