Address · Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
50 Cumberland St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Location
- 43.67084, -79.38924
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 5 | 3 | 23 July 2014 |
| 27 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 19 February 2015 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM17280 | Minto Urban Communities | 50 CUMBERLAND STREET | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 6 October 2011 – 24 May 2016 | 6 |
| SM15550 | Empire Restaurant | 50 Cumberland Street | Toronto Parking Authority | 10 December 2010 – 30 April 2011 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 9 September 2026Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 26 234558 STE 11 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 13 May 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 155457 STE 27 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 13 June 2014Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 14 173892 STE 27 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 12 June 2012Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 12 191650 STE 27 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26 234558 STE 11 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 9 September 2026 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 155457 STE 27 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 13 May 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 14 173892 STE 27 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 13 June 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 12 191650 STE 27 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 12 June 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
27 Yorkville Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
12 191650 STE 27 OZ · submitted 12 June 2012 · Closed · from registration SM17280 (Minto Urban Communities)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17280: 37 YORKVILLE AVENUE & 50 CUMBERLAND STREET (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 191650 STE 27 OZ at 27 Yorkville Ave: To construct a mixed-use development with a podium building and a 40 and 62-storey towers. A total of 1100 dwelling units are proposed, and the ground floor of the podium will be non-residential uses. A total of 1136 parking spaces will be provided below grade and above grade including an 800 Toron… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 37 YORKVILLE AVENUE & 50 CUMBERLAND STREET
Matched fields
- address
- 37 YORKVILLE AVE
- application_address
- 37 YORKVILLE AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
- Transaction Update of City-owned 50 Cumberland Street / 37 Yorkville Avenue (Municipal Car Park 15)2024.PA10.11 · 19 July 2024
- Lease Arrears at 50 Cumberland Street, Units 11 and 122024.PA9.9 · 28 May 2024
- Refund of Double-Repayment of Property Taxes - 50 Cumberland Street/37 Yorkville Avenue (Municipal Car Park 15)2023.PA3.11 · 21 April 2023
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11
46 lobbied · 113 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 46 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 9% | 0.09 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 113 | 1,629 | 100% (n=12) | 0% | 2% | 0.02 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11
69 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.