Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 12 146492 NNY 23 SA

57 Finch Ave W; 59 Finch Ave W; 61 Finch Ave W; 63 Finch Ave W

Ward 18 · Lily ChengDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Final Approval Completed; Approved
Submitted: 30 March 2012; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 1; 1 meeting · 1 office

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 57 Finch Ave W; 59 Finch Ave W; 61 Finch Ave W; 63 Finch Ave W
Ward: Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
Submitted: 30 March 2012
Status: Final Approval Completed
Outcome recorded: Approved
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Related file: 12 146486 NNY 23 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Original proposal for a 4-storey, 70 unit residential development with 68 underground parking spaces. Application has been appealed to the OMB and has been revised in accordance with the following: a reduction in the number of units from 70 to 42 and a shift from traditional apartment house dwelling units to back-to-back stacked townhouse units; a decrease in the proposed building coverage; the addition of a communal outdoor landscaped amenity area, doubling the overall amount of soft landscaping on the site; a shortened driveway due to a proposed car lift in replacement of the previously proposed car ramp; an increase in setbacks along the Finch and Elmview Avenue frontages and rear yard; removal of the previously proposed rooftop mechanical units; better integration of waste management facilities.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

2220294 Ontario Inc. · registration SM18264
Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Condominium Applications for Part of Lots 16, 17, 18 and 19 RP 3705, 57-63 Finch Avenue West
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18264: Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Condominium Applications for Part of Lots 16, 17, 18 and 19 RP 3705, 57-63 Finch Avenue West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 146492 NNY 23 SA at 57 Finch Ave W: Original proposal for a 4-storey, 70 unit residential development with 68 underground parking spaces. Application has been appealed to the OMB and has been revised in accordance with the following: a reduction in the number of units from 70 to 42 and a shift from traditional apartment house dwellin… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Condominium Applications for Part of Lots 16, 17, 18 and 19 RP 3705, 57-63 Finch Avenue West
Matched fields
address
57-63 FINCH AVE W
application_address
57 FINCH AVE W

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 1 communication · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 23 Willowdale1

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 23 Willowdale	Member of council	1	1	12 August 2014

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Weston Consulting Group Inc.1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 18

18 lobbied · 125 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 18: 18 lobbied and 125 matched unlobbied applications in 16 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	18	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	125	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.