Address · Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
61 Finch Ave W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
- Location
- 43.77881, -79.42089
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 62 FINCH AVE W (1 civic numbers away).
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 30 March 2012Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 12 146486 NNY 23 OZOMB Approved · Approved
- Submitted 30 March 2012Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 12 146492 NNY 23 SAFinal Approval Completed · Approved
- Submitted 12 November 2008Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 08 220968 NNY 23 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 146486 NNY 23 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 30 March 2012 | OMB Approved Approved |
| 12 146492 NNY 23 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 30 March 2012 | Final Approval Completed Approved |
| 08 220968 NNY 23 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 12 November 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
57 Finch Ave W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
12 146486 NNY 23 OZ · submitted 30 March 2012 · OMB Approved · from registration SM18264 (2220294 Ontario Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18264: Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Condominium Applications for Part of Lots 16, 17, 18 and 19 RP 3705, 57-63 Finch Avenue West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 146486 NNY 23 OZ at 57 Finch Ave W: Original proposal for a 4-storey, 70 unit residential development with 68 underground parking spaces. Application has been appealed to the OMB and has been revised in accordance with the following: a reduction in the number of units from 70 to 42 and a shift from traditional apartment house dwellin… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Condominium Applications for Part of Lots 16, 17, 18 and 19 RP 3705, 57-63 Finch Avenue West
Matched fields
- address
- 57-63 FINCH AVE W
- application_address
- 57 FINCH AVE W
57 Finch Ave W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
12 146492 NNY 23 SA · submitted 30 March 2012 · Final Approval Completed · from registration SM18264 (2220294 Ontario Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18264: Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Condominium Applications for Part of Lots 16, 17, 18 and 19 RP 3705, 57-63 Finch Avenue West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 146492 NNY 23 SA at 57 Finch Ave W: Original proposal for a 4-storey, 70 unit residential development with 68 underground parking spaces. Application has been appealed to the OMB and has been revised in accordance with the following: a reduction in the number of units from 70 to 42 and a shift from traditional apartment house dwellin… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Condominium Applications for Part of Lots 16, 17, 18 and 19 RP 3705, 57-63 Finch Avenue West
Matched fields
- address
- 57-63 FINCH AVE W
- application_address
- 57 FINCH AVE W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18
37 lobbied · 63 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 24% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 63 | — | 64% (n=5) | 36% | 16% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 18
18 lobbied · 125 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 18 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 125 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.