Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 12 139601 ESC 44 SA
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 20 March 2012
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 17 Island Rd
- Ward
- Ward 25 · Neethan Shan
- Submitted
- 20 March 2012
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 12 139597 ESC 44 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
A Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Application to permit 50, 3-storey stacked condominium townhouse units in two blocks. OMB appeal PL131192 approved May 14, 2014 in principle, final order issued March 25, 2015
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Stewart Turk · registration SM19630
17 Island Road
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19630: 17 Island Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 139601 ESC 44 SA at 17 Island Rd: A Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Application to permit 50, 3-storey stacked condominium townhouse units in two blocks. OMB appeal PL131192 approved May 14, 2014 in principle, final order issued March 25, 2015 (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 17 Island Road
Matched fields
- address
- 17 ISLAND RD
- application_address
- 17 ISLAND RD
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 5 communications · 0 meetings · 5 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 5 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 35 Scarborough Southwest | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 3 September 2013 |
| Ward 37 Scarborough Centre | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 3 September 2013 |
| Ward 38 Scarborough Centre | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 3 September 2013 |
| Ward 40 Scarborough-Agincourt | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 3 September 2013 |
| Ward 43 Scarborough East | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 3 September 2013 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 25
4 lobbied · 18 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 18 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.