Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 12 115522 STE 28 SA
66 Temperance Street; 70 Temperance St
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 1 February 2012
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 66 Temperance Street; 70 Temperance St
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 1 February 2012
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 798 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To construct a 54-storey residential building with 145 sq m. ground floor retail, 798 residential dwelling units and 100 below-grade parking spaces.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Skyline International Development Inc. · registration SM12562
70 Temperance Street (formerly 66 Temperance Street)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM12562: 70 Temperance Street (formerly 66 Temperance Street) (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 115522 STE 28 SA at 70 Temperance St: To construct a 54-storey residential building with 145 sq m. ground floor retail, 798 residential dwelling units and 100 below-grade parking spaces. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 70 Temperance Street (formerly 66 Temperance Street)
Matched fields
- address
- 70 TEMPERANCE ST
- application_address
- 70 TEMPERANCE ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 2 communications · 2 meetings · 2 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office of Councillor Pam McConnell, Ward 28 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 5 October 2011 |
| Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 5 October 2011 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Lifetime DevelopmentsSM17535 · 8 December 2011 · “70 Temperance Street”
- CentreCourt Developments Inc.SM17522 · 6 December 2011 · “66 Temperance Street”
- Skyline International Developments Inc.SM11659 · 1 May 2008 · “66 Temperance Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.