Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik

66 Temperance Street

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 3; 3 client organisations
Communications on those registrations: 10; 3 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 1; 1 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Location: 43.65046, -79.38221
How this address was located: Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 70 TEMPERANCE ST (4 civic numbers away).

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

CentreCourt Developments Inc.SM17522 · 6 December 20118
Skyline International Development Inc.SM12562 · 28 November 20082
Skyline International Developments Inc.SM11659 · 1 May 20080

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale8
Office of Councillor Pam McConnell, Ward 281
Pam McConnell Ward 281

Data table· 3 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale	Member of council	8	5	7 December 2012
Office of Councillor Pam McConnell, Ward 28	Councillor staff	1	1	5 October 2011
Pam McConnell Ward 28	Councillor staff	1	1	8 December 2011

All registrations· 3 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM17522	CentreCourt Developments Inc.	66 Temperance Street	Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law	6 December 2011 – 9 December 2013	8
SM12562	Skyline International Development Inc.	66 Temperance Street	Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance	28 November 2008 – 5 June 2012	2
SM11659	Skyline International Developments Inc.	66 Temperance Street	Planning and Development: Plan of Condominium	1 May 2008 – 1 May 2012	0

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 1 February 2012Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 12 115522 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 1 row

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
12 115522 STE 28 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	1 February 2012	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

70 Temperance St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
12 115522 STE 28 SA · submitted 1 February 2012 · Closed · from registration SM12562 (Skyline International Development Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM12562: 70 Temperance Street (formerly 66 Temperance Street) (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 115522 STE 28 SA at 70 Temperance St: To construct a 54-storey residential building with 145 sq m. ground floor retail, 798 residential dwelling units and 100 below-grade parking spaces. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 70 Temperance Street (formerly 66 Temperance Street)
Matched fields
address
70 TEMPERANCE ST
application_address
70 TEMPERANCE ST

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10

66 lobbied · 165 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=5
Matched, unlobbied100% n=11

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied3%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10: 66 lobbied and 165 matched unlobbied applications in 37 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	66	—	100% (n=5)	0%	3%	0.05
Matched, unlobbied	165	—	100% (n=11)	0%	2%	0.04

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.