Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 11 332287 STE 27 SA

Ward 11 · Dianne SaxeDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 30 December 2011; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 7; 3 meetings · 1 office

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 21 Avenue Rd
Ward: Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
Submitted: 30 December 2011
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 797 units
Related file: 11 332281 STE 27 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Site Plan Application (and corresponding Rezoning Application - File No. 11 332281 STE 27 OZ) to convert existing hotel into mixed use building and construct a new 40 storey tower fronting onto Cumberland St and Avenue Rd and a new 10 storey bulding fronting onto Yorkville Ave. Retail is proposed on the ground and second floor with a total of 797 residential units and 396 parking spaces in a multi level below grade parking facility. A total of 200 Bicycle parking spaces is also proposed.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Yorkville/Cumberland Neighbourhood Coalition · registration SM17934
Yorkville/Cumberland Neighbourhood Coalition (YCNC)re 21 Avenue Road, Toronto
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17934: Yorkville/Cumberland Neighbourhood Coalition (YCNC)re 21 Avenue Road, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 332287 STE 27 SA at 21 Avenue Rd: Site Plan Application (and corresponding Rezoning Application - File No. 11 332281 STE 27 OZ) to convert existing hotel into mixed use building and construct a new 40 storey tower fronting onto Cumberland St and Avenue Rd and a new 10 storey bulding fronting onto Yorkville Ave. Retail is proposed o… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Yorkville/Cumberland Neighbourhood Coalition (YCNC)re 21 Avenue Road, Toronto
Matched fields
address
21 AVENUE RD
application_address
21 AVENUE RD

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 7 communications · 3 meetings · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale7

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale	Member of council	7	3	6 April 2013

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Aird & Berlis LLP1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Yorkville/Cumberland Neighbourhood Coalition
SM18292 · 25 July 2012 · “21 Avenue Road.”
Felcorp
SM18244 · 3 July 2012 · “21 Avenue Rd”
Friends of Yorkville
SM14024 · 20 January 2010 · “21 Avenue Road.”
MTCC 626, MTCC 1276, 130 Bloor KS Inc., Standard Toronto Condominium Corporation 1920
SM13628 · 22 October 2009 · “21 Avenue Road”
Camrost-Feldcorp
SM11216 · 11 February 2008 · “21 Avenue Road”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11

46 lobbied · 113 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied1,629

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=2
Matched, unlobbied100% n=12

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied9%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11: 46 lobbied and 113 matched unlobbied applications in 26 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	46	—	100% (n=2)	0%	9%	0.09
Matched, unlobbied	113	1,629	100% (n=12)	0%	2%	0.02

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.