Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 11 179526 NNY 10 OZ
1 Goldthread Ter; 2 Goldthread Ter; 3 Goldthread Ter; 4 Goldthread Ter; 5 Goldthread Ter; 5 Wingstem Crt; 6 Goldthread Ter; 6 Wingstem Crt; 7 Goldthread Ter; 7 Wingstem Crt; 8 Goldthread Ter; 8 Wingstem Crt; 9 Goldthread Ter; 9 Wingstem Crt; 10 Goldthread Ter; 10 Wingstem Crt; 11 Goldthread Ter; 11 Wingstem Crt; 12 Goldthread Ter; 12 Wingstem Crt; 13 Goldthread Ter; 13 Wingstem Crt; 14 Goldthread Ter; 14 Wingstem Crt; 15 Goldthread Ter; 15 Wingstem Crt; 16 Goldthread Ter; 16 Wingstem Crt; 17 Goldthread Ter; 18 Goldthread Ter; 19 Goldthread Ter; 20 Goldthread Ter; 22 Goldthread Ter; 23 Goldthread Ter; 24 Goldthread Ter; 25 Goldthread Ter; 26 Goldthread Ter; 27 Goldthread Ter; 28 Goldthread Ter; 29 Goldthread Ter; 30 Goldthread Ter; 31 Goldthread Ter; 32 Goldthread Ter; 33 Goldthread Ter; 34 Goldthread Ter; 35 Goldthread Ter; 36 Goldthread Ter; 37 Goldthread Ter; 38 Goldthread Ter; 39 Goldthread Ter; 40 Goldthread Ter; 41 Goldthread Ter; 42 Goldthread Ter; 44 Goldthread Ter; 170 Maxwell St; 172 Maxwell St; 174 Maxwell St; 175 Goddard St; 176 Maxwell St; 177 Goddard St; 179 Goddard St; 181 Goddard St
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 20 April 2011
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 1 Goldthread Ter; 2 Goldthread Ter; 3 Goldthread Ter; 4 Goldthread Ter; 5 Goldthread Ter; 5 Wingstem Crt; 6 Goldthread Ter; 6 Wingstem Crt; 7 Goldthread Ter; 7 Wingstem Crt; 8 Goldthread Ter; 8 Wingstem Crt; 9 Goldthread Ter; 9 Wingstem Crt; 10 Goldthread Ter; 10 Wingstem Crt; 11 Goldthread Ter; 11 Wingstem Crt; 12 Goldthread Ter; 12 Wingstem Crt; 13 Goldthread Ter; 13 Wingstem Crt; 14 Goldthread Ter; 14 Wingstem Crt; 15 Goldthread Ter; 15 Wingstem Crt; 16 Goldthread Ter; 16 Wingstem Crt; 17 Goldthread Ter; 18 Goldthread Ter; 19 Goldthread Ter; 20 Goldthread Ter; 22 Goldthread Ter; 23 Goldthread Ter; 24 Goldthread Ter; 25 Goldthread Ter; 26 Goldthread Ter; 27 Goldthread Ter; 28 Goldthread Ter; 29 Goldthread Ter; 30 Goldthread Ter; 31 Goldthread Ter; 32 Goldthread Ter; 33 Goldthread Ter; 34 Goldthread Ter; 35 Goldthread Ter; 36 Goldthread Ter; 37 Goldthread Ter; 38 Goldthread Ter; 39 Goldthread Ter; 40 Goldthread Ter; 41 Goldthread Ter; 42 Goldthread Ter; 44 Goldthread Ter; 170 Maxwell St; 172 Maxwell St; 174 Maxwell St; 175 Goddard St; 176 Maxwell St; 177 Goddard St; 179 Goddard St; 181 Goddard St
- Ward
- Ward 6 · James Pasternak
- Submitted
- 20 April 2011
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 62 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
The proposal seeks to subdivide the subject site for 8 lots for single detached dwellings, 27 lots for semi-detached dwellings, (for a total of 62 units), a new public through street and a new public cul-de-sac.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
TACC Developments · registration SM16926
To provide a description about the development proposal at 175 Goddard Street.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM16926: To provide a description about the development proposal at 175 Goddard Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 179526 NNY 10 OZ at 175 Goddard St: The proposal seeks to subdivide the subject site for 8 lots for single detached dwellings, 27 lots for semi-detached dwellings, (for a total of 62 units), a new public through street and a new public cul-de-sac. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: To provide a description about the development proposal at 175 Goddard Street.
Matched fields
- address
- 175 GODDARD ST
- application_address
- 175 GODDARD ST
TACC Developments · registration SM16927
To provide a description about the development proposal at 175 Goddard Street.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM16927: To provide a description about the development proposal at 175 Goddard Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 179526 NNY 10 OZ at 175 Goddard St: The proposal seeks to subdivide the subject site for 8 lots for single detached dwellings, 27 lots for semi-detached dwellings, (for a total of 62 units), a new public through street and a new public cul-de-sac. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: To provide a description about the development proposal at 175 Goddard Street.
Matched fields
- address
- 175 GODDARD ST
- application_address
- 175 GODDARD ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 2 communications · 2 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 10 York Centre | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 18 August 2011 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Brookstone Developments LimitedSM13066 · 12 May 2009 · “175 Goddard St.”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 6
13 lobbied · 16 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.