18 Goldthread Ter

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 0
Communications on those registrations: 0
Applications at this address: 1; 2 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 6 · James Pasternak
Location: 43.76272, -79.45035
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

None.

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

No communications recorded.

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 20 April 2011Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 11 179526 NNY 10 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 1 row

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
11 179526 NNY 10 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	20 April 2011	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

175 Goddard St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 179526 NNY 10 OZ · submitted 20 April 2011 · Closed · from registration SM16926 (TACC Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM16926: To provide a description about the development proposal at 175 Goddard Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 179526 NNY 10 OZ at 175 Goddard St: The proposal seeks to subdivide the subject site for 8 lots for single detached dwellings, 27 lots for semi-detached dwellings, (for a total of 62 units), a new public through street and a new public cul-de-sac. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: To provide a description about the development proposal at 175 Goddard Street.
Matched fields
address
175 GODDARD ST
application_address
175 GODDARD ST
175 Goddard St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 179526 NNY 10 OZ · submitted 20 April 2011 · Closed · from registration SM16927 (TACC Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM16927: To provide a description about the development proposal at 175 Goddard Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 179526 NNY 10 OZ at 175 Goddard St: The proposal seeks to subdivide the subject site for 8 lots for single detached dwellings, 27 lots for semi-detached dwellings, (for a total of 62 units), a new public through street and a new public cul-de-sac. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: To provide a description about the development proposal at 175 Goddard Street.
Matched fields
address
175 GODDARD ST
application_address
175 GODDARD ST

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 6

13 lobbied · 16 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 6: 13 lobbied and 16 matched unlobbied applications in 12 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	13	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	16	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.