Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 11 141212 ESC 37 OZ

1 De Jong St; 1 Kawneer Ter; 2 De Jong St; 2 Kawneer Ter; 2 Zezel Way; 3 De Jong St; 3 Kawneer Ter; 4 De Jong St; 4 Kawneer Ter; 4 Zezel Way; 5 De Jong St; 5 Kawneer Ter; 6 De Jong St; 6 Kawneer Ter; 6 Zezel Way; 7 De Jong St; 7 Kawneer Ter; 8 De Jong St; 8 Kawneer Ter; 8 Zezel Way; 9 De Jong St; 9 Kawneer Ter; 10 De Jong St; 10 Kawneer Ter; 10 Zezel Way; 11 De Jong St; 11 Kawneer Ter; 12 De Jong St; 12 Kawneer Ter; 12 Zezel Way; 13 De Jong St; 13 Kawneer Ter; 14 De Jong St; 14 Kawneer Ter; 14 Zezel Way; 15 De Jong St; 15 Kawneer Ter; 16 De Jong St; 16 Kawneer Ter; 16 Zezel Way; 17 De Jong St; 17 Kawneer Ter; 18 De Jong St; 18 Kawneer Ter; 18 Zezel Way; 19 De Jong St; 19 Kawneer Ter; 20 De Jong St; 20 Kawneer Ter; 20 Zezel Way; 21 De Jong St; 21 Kawneer Ter; 22 De Jong St; 22 Kawneer Ter; 22 Zezel Way; 23 De Jong St; 23 Kawneer Ter; 24 De Jong St; 24 Kawneer Ter; 24 Zezel Way; 25 De Jong St; 25 Kawneer Ter; 26 De Jong St; 26 Kawneer Ter; 26 Zezel Way; 27 De Jong St; 27 Kawneer Ter; 28 De Jong St; 28 Kawneer Ter; 28 Zezel Way; 29 De Jong St; 29 Kawneer Ter; 30 De Jong St; 30 Kawneer Ter; 30 Zezel Way; 31 De Jong St; 31 Kawneer Ter; 32 De Jong St; 32 Kawneer Ter; 32 Zezel Way; 33 De Jong St; 33 Kawneer Ter; 34 De Jong St; 34 Kawneer Ter; 34 Zezel Way; 35 De Jong St; 35 Kawneer Ter; 36 De Jong St; 36 Kawneer Ter; 36 Zezel Way; 37 De Jong St; 37 Kawneer Ter; 38 De Jong St; 38 Kawneer Ter; 38 Zezel Way; 39 De Jong St; 39 Kawneer Ter; 40 De Jong St; 40 Kawneer Ter; 40 Zezel Way; 41 De Jong St; 41 Kawneer Ter; 42 De Jong St; 42 Kawneer Ter; 42 Zezel Way; 43 De Jong St; 43 Kawneer Ter; 44 De Jong St; 44 Kawneer Ter; 44 Zezel Way; 45 De Jong St; 45 Kawneer Ter; 46 De Jong St; 46 Kawneer Ter; 46 Zezel Way; 47 De Jong St; 47 Kawneer Ter; 48 De Jong St; 48 Kawneer Ter; 48 Zezel Way; 49 De Jong St; 49 Kawneer Ter; 50 De Jong St; 50 Kawneer Ter; 50 Zezel Way; 52 Zezel Way; 54 Zezel Way; 56 Zezel Way; 58 Zezel Way; 60 Zezel Way; 62 Zezel Way; 64 Zezel Way; 66 Zezel Way; 68 Zezel Way; 70 Zezel Way; 72 Zezel Way; 74 Zezel Way; 1027 Ellesmere Rd; 1029 Ellesmere Rd; 1031 Ellesmere Rd; 1033 Ellesmere Rd; 1035 Ellesmere Rd; 1037 Ellesmere Rd; 1039 Ellesmere Rd; 1041 Ellesmere Rd; 1043 Ellesmere Rd; 1045 Ellesmere Rd; 1047 Ellesmere Rd; 1049 Ellesmere Rd; 1051 Ellesmere Rd; 1053 Ellesmere Rd; 1055 Ellesmere Rd; 1057 Ellesmere Rd; 1059 Ellesmere Rd; 1061 Ellesmere Rd; 1063 Ellesmere Rd; 1065 Ellesmere Rd; 1067 Ellesmere Rd; 1069 Ellesmere Rd; 1071A Ellesmere Rd; 1071B Ellesmere Rd; 1073 Ellesmere Rd

Ward 21 · Michael ThompsonDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 9 March 2011; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 2; 1 meeting · 2 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 1 De Jong St; 1 Kawneer Ter; 2 De Jong St; 2 Kawneer Ter; 2 Zezel Way; 3 De Jong St; 3 Kawneer Ter; 4 De Jong St; 4 Kawneer Ter; 4 Zezel Way; 5 De Jong St; 5 Kawneer Ter; 6 De Jong St; 6 Kawneer Ter; 6 Zezel Way; 7 De Jong St; 7 Kawneer Ter; 8 De Jong St; 8 Kawneer Ter; 8 Zezel Way; 9 De Jong St; 9 Kawneer Ter; 10 De Jong St; 10 Kawneer Ter; 10 Zezel Way; 11 De Jong St; 11 Kawneer Ter; 12 De Jong St; 12 Kawneer Ter; 12 Zezel Way; 13 De Jong St; 13 Kawneer Ter; 14 De Jong St; 14 Kawneer Ter; 14 Zezel Way; 15 De Jong St; 15 Kawneer Ter; 16 De Jong St; 16 Kawneer Ter; 16 Zezel Way; 17 De Jong St; 17 Kawneer Ter; 18 De Jong St; 18 Kawneer Ter; 18 Zezel Way; 19 De Jong St; 19 Kawneer Ter; 20 De Jong St; 20 Kawneer Ter; 20 Zezel Way; 21 De Jong St; 21 Kawneer Ter; 22 De Jong St; 22 Kawneer Ter; 22 Zezel Way; 23 De Jong St; 23 Kawneer Ter; 24 De Jong St; 24 Kawneer Ter; 24 Zezel Way; 25 De Jong St; 25 Kawneer Ter; 26 De Jong St; 26 Kawneer Ter; 26 Zezel Way; 27 De Jong St; 27 Kawneer Ter; 28 De Jong St; 28 Kawneer Ter; 28 Zezel Way; 29 De Jong St; 29 Kawneer Ter; 30 De Jong St; 30 Kawneer Ter; 30 Zezel Way; 31 De Jong St; 31 Kawneer Ter; 32 De Jong St; 32 Kawneer Ter; 32 Zezel Way; 33 De Jong St; 33 Kawneer Ter; 34 De Jong St; 34 Kawneer Ter; 34 Zezel Way; 35 De Jong St; 35 Kawneer Ter; 36 De Jong St; 36 Kawneer Ter; 36 Zezel Way; 37 De Jong St; 37 Kawneer Ter; 38 De Jong St; 38 Kawneer Ter; 38 Zezel Way; 39 De Jong St; 39 Kawneer Ter; 40 De Jong St; 40 Kawneer Ter; 40 Zezel Way; 41 De Jong St; 41 Kawneer Ter; 42 De Jong St; 42 Kawneer Ter; 42 Zezel Way; 43 De Jong St; 43 Kawneer Ter; 44 De Jong St; 44 Kawneer Ter; 44 Zezel Way; 45 De Jong St; 45 Kawneer Ter; 46 De Jong St; 46 Kawneer Ter; 46 Zezel Way; 47 De Jong St; 47 Kawneer Ter; 48 De Jong St; 48 Kawneer Ter; 48 Zezel Way; 49 De Jong St; 49 Kawneer Ter; 50 De Jong St; 50 Kawneer Ter; 50 Zezel Way; 52 Zezel Way; 54 Zezel Way; 56 Zezel Way; 58 Zezel Way; 60 Zezel Way; 62 Zezel Way; 64 Zezel Way; 66 Zezel Way; 68 Zezel Way; 70 Zezel Way; 72 Zezel Way; 74 Zezel Way; 1027 Ellesmere Rd; 1029 Ellesmere Rd; 1031 Ellesmere Rd; 1033 Ellesmere Rd; 1035 Ellesmere Rd; 1037 Ellesmere Rd; 1039 Ellesmere Rd; 1041 Ellesmere Rd; 1043 Ellesmere Rd; 1045 Ellesmere Rd; 1047 Ellesmere Rd; 1049 Ellesmere Rd; 1051 Ellesmere Rd; 1053 Ellesmere Rd; 1055 Ellesmere Rd; 1057 Ellesmere Rd; 1059 Ellesmere Rd; 1061 Ellesmere Rd; 1063 Ellesmere Rd; 1065 Ellesmere Rd; 1067 Ellesmere Rd; 1069 Ellesmere Rd; 1071A Ellesmere Rd; 1071B Ellesmere Rd; 1073 Ellesmere Rd
Ward: Ward 21 · Michael Thompson
Submitted: 9 March 2011
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

construct 162 freehold townhouses

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

A. Mantella & Sons · registration SM17384
1051 Ellesmere Rd. Scarborough
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17384: 1051 Ellesmere Rd. Scarborough (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 141212 ESC 37 OZ at 1051 Ellesmere Rd: construct 162 freehold townhouses (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1051 Ellesmere Rd. Scarborough
Matched fields
address
1051 ELLESMERE RD
application_address
1051 ELLESMERE RD
The Goldman Group · registration SM16027
Processing and Approvals of the Rezoning, Plan of Subdivision and Site Plan applications for 1051 Ellesmere Road.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM16027: Processing and Approvals of the Rezoning, Plan of Subdivision and Site Plan applications for 1051 Ellesmere Road. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 141212 ESC 37 OZ at 1051 Ellesmere Rd: construct 162 freehold townhouses (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Processing and Approvals of the Rezoning, Plan of Subdivision and Site Plan applications for 1051 Ellesmere Road.
Matched fields
address
1051 ELLESMERE RD
application_address
1051 ELLESMERE RD

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 2 communications · 1 meeting · 2 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 2 Etobicoke North1
Ward 37 Scarborough Centre1

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 2 Etobicoke North	Member of council	1	0	28 October 2011
Ward 37 Scarborough Centre	Member of council	1	1	28 October 2011

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Bratty & Partners, LLP1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 21

15 lobbied · 21 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 21: 15 lobbied and 21 matched unlobbied applications in 12 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	15	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	21	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.