Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 09 185989 STE 19 SA

Ward 10 · Ausma MalikDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 6 November 2009; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 0; 0 meetings · 0 offices

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 24 Bathurst St; 169 Fort York Blvd
Ward: Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Submitted: 6 November 2009
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Site plan approval for new mixed use building - Building 6N - 242Residential Units - 12 Stories - 218Below grade parking - 3 levels below grade - 1354 m2 commercial space.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Onni Group of Companies · registration SM12881
20, 22, 22A and 24 Bathurst Street (Fort York Neighbourhood Parcels 4, 4A, 6N and 6S) site plan application and re-zoning applications pertaining to Blocks 6S, 6N, 4 and 4A in the Fort York Neighbour…
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM12881: 20, 22, 22A and 24 Bathurst Street (Fort York Neighbourhood Parcels 4, 4A, 6N and 6S) site plan application and re-zoning applications pertaining to Blocks 6S, 6N, 4 and 4A in the Fort York Neighbourhood. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 09 185989 STE 19 SA at 169 Fort York Blvd: Site plan approval for new mixed use building - Building 6N - 242Residential Units - 12 Stories - 218Below grade parking - 3 levels below grade - 1354 m2 commercial space. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 20, 22, 22A and 24 Bathurst Street (Fort York Neighbourhood Parcels 4, 4A, 6N and 6S) site plan application and re-zoning applications pertaining to Block…
Matched fields
address
24 BATHURST ST
application_address
24 BATHURST ST
Onni Group of Companies · registration SM12733
Site Plan Approval for 24 Bathurst Street (Fort York Neighbourhood) Block 6N
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM12733: Site Plan Approval for 24 Bathurst Street (Fort York Neighbourhood) Block 6N (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 09 185989 STE 19 SA at 169 Fort York Blvd: Site plan approval for new mixed use building - Building 6N - 242Residential Units - 12 Stories - 218Below grade parking - 3 levels below grade - 1354 m2 commercial space. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Site Plan Approval for 24 Bathurst Street (Fort York Neighbourhood) Block 6N
Matched fields
address
24 BATHURST ST
application_address
24 BATHURST ST

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

No communications recorded.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Onni Group of Companies
SM12659 · 1 January 2009 · “24 Bathurst Street”
Onni Group of Companies
SM12661 · 1 January 2009 · “24 Bathurst Street”
Onni Fort York Development Limited Partnership
SM12583 · 9 December 2008 · “24 Bathurst Street”
Onni Group of Companies
SM11836 · 5 June 2008 · “24 Bathurst Street”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10

66 lobbied · 165 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied1,881

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=5
Matched, unlobbied100% n=11

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied3%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10: 66 lobbied and 165 matched unlobbied applications in 37 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	66	—	100% (n=5)	0%	3%	0.05
Matched, unlobbied	165	1,881	100% (n=11)	0%	2%	0.04

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.