Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
169 Fort York Blvd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.63838, -79.40106
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 6 November 2009Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 09 185989 STE 19 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09 185989 STE 19 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 6 November 2009 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
169 Fort York Blvd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
09 185989 STE 19 SA · submitted 6 November 2009 · Closed · from registration SM12733 (Onni Group of Companies)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM12733: Site Plan Approval for 24 Bathurst Street (Fort York Neighbourhood) Block 6N (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 09 185989 STE 19 SA at 169 Fort York Blvd: Site plan approval for new mixed use building - Building 6N - 242Residential Units - 12 Stories - 218Below grade parking - 3 levels below grade - 1354 m2 commercial space. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Site Plan Approval for 24 Bathurst Street (Fort York Neighbourhood) Block 6N
Matched fields
- address
- 24 BATHURST ST
- application_address
- 24 BATHURST ST
169 Fort York Blvd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
09 185989 STE 19 SA · submitted 6 November 2009 · Closed · from registration SM12881 (Onni Group of Companies)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM12881: 20, 22, 22A and 24 Bathurst Street (Fort York Neighbourhood Parcels 4, 4A, 6N and 6S) site plan application and re-zoning applications pertaining to Blocks 6S, 6N, 4 and 4A in the Fort York Neighbourhood. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 09 185989 STE 19 SA at 169 Fort York Blvd: Site plan approval for new mixed use building - Building 6N - 242Residential Units - 12 Stories - 218Below grade parking - 3 levels below grade - 1354 m2 commercial space. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 20, 22, 22A and 24 Bathurst Street (Fort York Neighbourhood Parcels 4, 4A, 6N and 6S) site plan application and re-zoning applications pertaining to Block…
Matched fields
- address
- 24 BATHURST ST
- application_address
- 24 BATHURST ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | 1,881 | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.