lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 09 174933 STE 32 OZ

66 Kippendavie Ave; 68 Kippendavie Ave; 70 Kippendavie Ave; 72 Kippendavie Ave; 74 Kippendavie Ave; 76 Kippendavie Avenue

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
1 October 2009
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
2
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
22
8 meetings · 19 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
66 Kippendavie Ave; 68 Kippendavie Ave; 70 Kippendavie Ave; 72 Kippendavie Ave; 74 Kippendavie Ave; 76 Kippendavie Avenue
Ward
Ward 19 · Brad Bradford
Submitted
1 October 2009
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Proposal to redevelop lands for a 4 storey, 65 unit residential condo containing 1 level of below grade parking.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 22 communications · 8 meetings · 19 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Ward 14 Parkdale-High Park2
  • Ward 21 St. Paul's2
  • Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale2
  • Office of Councillor Layton1
  • Office of Councillor Wong-Tam1
  • Ward 16 Eglinton-Lawrence1
  • Ward 18 Davenport1
  • Ward 19 Trinity-Spadina1
Data table· 19 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 14 Parkdale-High ParkMember of council2016 March 2011
Ward 21 St. Paul'sMember of council2016 March 2011
Ward 28 Toronto Centre-RosedaleMember of council2016 March 2011
Office of Councillor LaytonCouncillor staff109 March 2011
Office of Councillor Wong-TamCouncillor staff109 March 2011
Ward 16 Eglinton-LawrenceMember of council1131 March 2011
Ward 18 DavenportMember of council1016 March 2011
Ward 19 Trinity-SpadinaMember of council1116 March 2011
Ward 20 Trinity-SpadinaMember of council1016 March 2011
Ward 27 Toronto Centre-RosedaleMember of council1016 March 2011
Ward 29 Toronto-DanforthMember of council1016 March 2011
Ward 30 Toronto-DanforthMember of council1016 March 2011
Ward 31 Beaches-East YorkMember of council1016 March 2011
Ward 32 Beaches-East YorkMember of council118 March 2011
Ward 33 Don Valley EastMember of council118 April 2011
Ward 34 Don Valley EastMember of council117 April 2011
Ward 35 Scarborough SouthwestMember of council117 April 2011
Ward 40 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council114 April 2011
Ward 5 Etobicoke-LakeshoreMember of council114 April 2011

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 19

7 lobbied · 10 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 19: 7 lobbied and 10 matched unlobbied applications in 6 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied7Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied10Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.