Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 09 174933 STE 32 OZ
66 Kippendavie Ave; 68 Kippendavie Ave; 70 Kippendavie Ave; 72 Kippendavie Ave; 74 Kippendavie Ave; 76 Kippendavie Avenue
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 1 October 2009
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 66 Kippendavie Ave; 68 Kippendavie Ave; 70 Kippendavie Ave; 72 Kippendavie Ave; 74 Kippendavie Ave; 76 Kippendavie Avenue
- Ward
- Ward 19 · Brad Bradford
- Submitted
- 1 October 2009
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Proposal to redevelop lands for a 4 storey, 65 unit residential condo containing 1 level of below grade parking.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Darlon Investments Corporation · registration SM15795
66-76 Kippendavie Avenue -- Rezoning Application
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM15795: 66-76 Kippendavie Avenue -- Rezoning Application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 09 174933 STE 32 OZ at 66 Kippendavie Ave: Proposal to redevelop lands for a 4 storey, 65 unit residential condo containing 1 level of below grade parking. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 66-76 Kippendavie Avenue -- Rezoning Application
Matched fields
- address
- 66-76 KIPPENDAVIE AVE
- application_address
- 66 KIPPENDAVIE AVE
Darlon Darlon Investments Corporation · registration SM15764
66 to 76 Kippendavie Avenue - Rezoning Application
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM15764: 66 to 76 Kippendavie Avenue - Rezoning Application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 09 174933 STE 32 OZ at 66 Kippendavie Ave: Proposal to redevelop lands for a 4 storey, 65 unit residential condo containing 1 level of below grade parking. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 66 to 76 Kippendavie Avenue - Rezoning Application
Matched fields
- address
- 76 KIPPENDAVIE AVE
- application_address
- 76 KIPPENDAVIE AVE
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 22 communications · 8 meetings · 19 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 19 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 14 Parkdale-High Park | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 16 March 2011 |
| Ward 21 St. Paul's | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 16 March 2011 |
| Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 16 March 2011 |
| Office of Councillor Layton | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 9 March 2011 |
| Office of Councillor Wong-Tam | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 9 March 2011 |
| Ward 16 Eglinton-Lawrence | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 31 March 2011 |
| Ward 18 Davenport | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 16 March 2011 |
| Ward 19 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 16 March 2011 |
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 16 March 2011 |
| Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 16 March 2011 |
| Ward 29 Toronto-Danforth | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 16 March 2011 |
| Ward 30 Toronto-Danforth | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 16 March 2011 |
| Ward 31 Beaches-East York | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 16 March 2011 |
| Ward 32 Beaches-East York | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 8 March 2011 |
| Ward 33 Don Valley East | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 8 April 2011 |
| Ward 34 Don Valley East | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 7 April 2011 |
| Ward 35 Scarborough Southwest | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 7 April 2011 |
| Ward 40 Scarborough-Agincourt | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 4 April 2011 |
| Ward 5 Etobicoke-Lakeshore | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 4 April 2011 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 19
7 lobbied · 10 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.