Address · Ward 19 · Brad Bradford
76 Kippendavie Avenue
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 19 · Brad Bradford
- Location
- 43.66790, -79.30313
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 75 KIPPENDAVIE AVE (1 civic numbers away).
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 15 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 14 Parkdale-High Park | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 16 March 2011 |
| Ward 21 St. Paul's | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 16 March 2011 |
| Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 16 March 2011 |
| Ward 16 Eglinton-Lawrence | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 31 March 2011 |
| Ward 18 Davenport | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 16 March 2011 |
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 16 March 2011 |
| Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 16 March 2011 |
| Ward 29 Toronto-Danforth | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 16 March 2011 |
| Ward 30 Toronto-Danforth | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 16 March 2011 |
| Ward 31 Beaches-East York | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 16 March 2011 |
| Ward 33 Don Valley East | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 8 April 2011 |
| Ward 34 Don Valley East | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 7 April 2011 |
| Ward 35 Scarborough Southwest | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 7 April 2011 |
| Ward 40 Scarborough-Agincourt | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 4 April 2011 |
| Ward 5 Etobicoke-Lakeshore | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 4 April 2011 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM15764 | Darlon Darlon Investments Corporation | 76 Kippendavie Avenue | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 21 January 2011 – 30 June 2011 | 18 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 22 May 2013Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 13 172523 STE 32 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 1 October 2009Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 09 174933 STE 32 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 1 October 2009Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 09 174949 STE 32 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 172523 STE 32 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 22 May 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 09 174933 STE 32 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 1 October 2009 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 09 174949 STE 32 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 1 October 2009 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
66 Kippendavie Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
09 174933 STE 32 OZ · submitted 1 October 2009 · Closed · from registration SM15764 (Darlon Darlon Investments Corporation)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM15764: 66 to 76 Kippendavie Avenue - Rezoning Application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 09 174933 STE 32 OZ at 66 Kippendavie Ave: Proposal to redevelop lands for a 4 storey, 65 unit residential condo containing 1 level of below grade parking. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 66 to 76 Kippendavie Avenue - Rezoning Application
Matched fields
- address
- 76 KIPPENDAVIE AVE
- application_address
- 76 KIPPENDAVIE AVE
66 Kippendavie Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
09 174933 STE 32 OZ · submitted 1 October 2009 · Closed · from registration SM15795 (Darlon Investments Corporation)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM15795: 66-76 Kippendavie Avenue -- Rezoning Application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 09 174933 STE 32 OZ at 66 Kippendavie Ave: Proposal to redevelop lands for a 4 storey, 65 unit residential condo containing 1 level of below grade parking. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 66-76 Kippendavie Avenue -- Rezoning Application
Matched fields
- address
- 66-76 KIPPENDAVIE AVE
- application_address
- 66 KIPPENDAVIE AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 19
1 lobbied · 1 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 19
7 lobbied · 10 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 19
6 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.