Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 08 231395 STE 21 OZ
89 Dewbourne Ave; 1950 Bathurst St
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 22 December 2008
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 89 Dewbourne Ave; 1950 Bathurst St
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Submitted
- 22 December 2008
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Re zoning application to construct Private day school attached to existing Place of worship (sanctuary hall to be maintained on site) New Floor area is 783m2.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Holy Blossom Temple · registration SM12309
Pending Rezoning Application: 1950 Bathurst Street Expansion
Evidence High confidence · score 0.94
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM12309: Pending Rezoning Application: 1950 Bathurst Street Expansion (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 231395 STE 21 OZ at 1950 Bathurst St: Re zoning application to construct Private day school attached to existing Place of worship (sanctuary hall to be maintained on site) New Floor area is 783m2. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Pending Rezoning Application: 1950 Bathurst Street Expansion
Matched fields
- address
- 1950 BATHURST ST
- application_address
- 1950 BATHURST ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Holy Blossom TempleSM25645 · 12 February 2018 · “1950 Bathurst Street”
- Holy Blossom TempleSM25651 · 12 February 2018 · “1950 Bathurst Street”
- Holy Blossom TempleSM20378 · 1 May 2014 · “1950 Bathurst Street”
- Holy Blossom TempleSM20015 · 20 January 2014 · “1950 Bathurst Street”
- Holy Blossom TempleSM20016 · 20 January 2014 · “1950 Bathurst st.”
- Holy Blossom TempleSM11770 · 21 May 2008 · “1950 Bathurst Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12
44 lobbied · 60 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 44 | 1,925 | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 14% | 0.02 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | 1,799 | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.