Address · Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
1950 Bathurst St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Location
- 43.69828, -79.42526
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
7These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 21 St. Paul's | Member of council | 6 | 6 | 16 February 2018 |
All registrations· 7 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM25645 | Holy Blossom Temple | 1950 Bathurst Street | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 12 February 2018 – 12 February 2019 | 1 |
| SM25651 | Holy Blossom Temple | 1950 Bathurst Street | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 12 February 2018 – 31 December 2020 | 1 |
| SM20378 | Holy Blossom Temple | 1950 Bathurst Street | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 1 May 2014 – 7 May 2016 | 1 |
| SM20015 | Holy Blossom Temple | 1950 Bathurst Street | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 20 January 2014 – 18 January 2017 | 2 |
| SM20016 | Holy Blossom Temple | 1950 Bathurst st. | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 20 January 2014 – 19 January 2015 | 1 |
| SM12309 | Holy Blossom Temple | 1950 Bathurst Street | Planning and Development Application: Zoning By-law | 26 September 2008 – 25 July 2011 | 0 |
| SM11770 | Holy Blossom Temple | 1950 Bathurst Street | Planning Application - Rezoning and Site Plan Application | 21 May 2008 – 25 February 2013 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 22 December 2009Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 09 199001 STE 21 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 22 December 2008Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 08 231395 STE 21 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09 199001 STE 21 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 22 December 2009 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 08 231395 STE 21 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 22 December 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1950 Bathurst St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
08 231395 STE 21 OZ · submitted 22 December 2008 · Closed · from registration SM12309 (Holy Blossom Temple)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.94
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM12309: Pending Rezoning Application: 1950 Bathurst Street Expansion (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 231395 STE 21 OZ at 1950 Bathurst St: Re zoning application to construct Private day school attached to existing Place of worship (sanctuary hall to be maintained on site) New Floor area is 783m2. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Pending Rezoning Application: 1950 Bathurst Street Expansion
Matched fields
- address
- 1950 BATHURST ST
- application_address
- 1950 BATHURST ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12
32 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 32 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 3% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12
44 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 44 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 14% | 0.02 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.