Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 08 195173 WET 02 OZ
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 19 August 2008
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 50 Resources Road
- Ward
- Ward 1 · Vincent Crisanti
- Submitted
- 19 August 2008
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Proposal to rezone the property to permit the development of a large-format home improvement retail store and employment uses currently allowed by the by-law.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Lowe's Companies Canada, ULC · registration SM13826
50 Resources Road
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM13826: 50 Resources Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 195173 WET 02 OZ at 50 Resources Rd: Proposal to rezone the property to permit the development of a large-format home improvement retail store and employment uses currently allowed by the by-law. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 50 Resources Road
Matched fields
- address
- 50 RESOURCES RD
- application_address
- 50 RESOURCES RD
Lowe's Companies Canada, ULC · registration SM12969
50 Resources Road
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM12969: 50 Resources Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 195173 WET 02 OZ at 50 Resources Rd: Proposal to rezone the property to permit the development of a large-format home improvement retail store and employment uses currently allowed by the by-law. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 50 Resources Road
Matched fields
- address
- 50 RESOURCES RD
- application_address
- 50 RESOURCES RD
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Woodbine Entertainment GroupSM13057 · 1 April 2009 · “50 Resources Road”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.