Address · Ward 1 · Vincent Crisanti
50 Resources Road
- Communications on those registrations
- 0
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 1 · Vincent Crisanti
- Location
- 43.70938, -79.54897
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 53 RESOURCES RD (3 civic numbers away).
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM13826 | Lowe's Companies Canada, ULC | 50 Resources Road | Planning and Development, Combined Application, Official Plan, Zoning By-law | 2 December 2009 – 1 December 2010 | 0 |
| SM13057 | Woodbine Entertainment Group | 50 Resources Road | Planning & Development, Combined Application, Zoning By-law, Plan of Subdivision | 1 April 2009 – 23 December 2011 | 0 |
| SM12969 | Lowe's Companies Canada, ULC | 50 Resources Road | Planning and Development, Combined Application, Official Plan, Zoning By-law | 2 March 2009 – 30 August 2011 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 4 June 2010Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 10 189749 WET 02 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 19 August 2008Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 08 195173 WET 02 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 19 August 2008Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 08 195178 WET 02 SBClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 189749 WET 02 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 4 June 2010 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 08 195173 WET 02 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 19 August 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 08 195178 WET 02 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 19 August 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
50 Resources Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
08 195173 WET 02 OZ · submitted 19 August 2008 · Closed · from registration SM12969 (Lowe's Companies Canada, ULC)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM12969: 50 Resources Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 195173 WET 02 OZ at 50 Resources Rd: Proposal to rezone the property to permit the development of a large-format home improvement retail store and employment uses currently allowed by the by-law. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 50 Resources Road
Matched fields
- address
- 50 RESOURCES RD
- application_address
- 50 RESOURCES RD
50 Resources Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
08 195173 WET 02 OZ · submitted 19 August 2008 · Closed · from registration SM13826 (Lowe's Companies Canada, ULC)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM13826: 50 Resources Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 195173 WET 02 OZ at 50 Resources Rd: Proposal to rezone the property to permit the development of a large-format home improvement retail store and employment uses currently allowed by the by-law. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 50 Resources Road
Matched fields
- address
- 50 RESOURCES RD
- application_address
- 50 RESOURCES RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 1
4 lobbied · 12 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.