Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 08 176116 STE 27 OZ

Ward 11 · Dianne SaxeDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 27 June 2008; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 3; 3 meetings · 2 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 2 Bloor St W; 790 Yonge St
Ward: Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
Submitted: 27 June 2008
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Redevelopment of Cumberland Terrace for a mixed use building(s) containing an 35 storey and 45 storey mixed use residential commercial tower, 9 three storey "villas",commercial space, and accessory uses.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Oxford Properties Group · registration SM15744
regarding planning and development application (Zoning by-law)/Ontario Municipal Board Case No. PL100851 concerning property located at 2 Bloor Street West / Cumberland Terrace (Client: OPGI Manageme…
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM15744: regarding planning and development application (Zoning by-law)/Ontario Municipal Board Case No. PL100851 concerning property located at 2 Bloor Street West / Cumberland Terrace (Client: OPGI Management GP Inc) (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 176116 STE 27 OZ at 2 Bloor St W: Redevelopment of Cumberland Terrace for a mixed use building(s) containing an 35 storey and 45 storey mixed use residential commercial tower, 9 three storey "villas",commercial space, and accessory uses. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …ng and development application (Zoning by-law)/Ontario Municipal Board Case No. PL100851 concerning property located at 2 Bloor Street West / Cumberland Terrace (Client: OPGI Management GP Inc)
Matched fields
address
2 BLOOR ST W
application_address
2 BLOOR ST W

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 3 communications · 3 meetings · 2 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale2
Ward 5 Etobicoke-Lakeshore1

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale	Member of council	2	2	27 May 2013
Ward 5 Etobicoke-Lakeshore	Member of council	1	1	20 December 2010

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Urban Strategies Inc.1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Kingsett Capital
SM27123 · 4 December 2018 · “2 Bloor Street West”
Pattison Outdoor Advertising
SM20152 · 5 March 2014 · “2 Bloor St. W”
2008221 Ontario Inc.
SM15547 · 10 December 2010 · “2 Bloor Street West.”
OPGI Management GP Inc.
SM11804 · 26 May 2008 · “2 Bloor Street West”
OPGI Management GP Inc.
SM11735 · 12 May 2008 · “2 Bloor Street West”
OPGI Management GP Inc.
SM11757 · 12 May 2008 · “2 Bloor Street West”
Oxford Properties Group
SM11789 · 12 May 2008 · “2 Bloor Street West”
Oxford Properties Group
SM11791 · 12 May 2008 · “2 Bloor Street West”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11

69 lobbied · 60 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=10
Matched, unlobbied100% n=4

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied10%
Matched, unlobbied11%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11: 69 lobbied and 60 matched unlobbied applications in 31 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	69	—	100% (n=10)	0%	10%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	60	—	100% (n=4)	0%	11%	0.03

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.