Address · Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
2 Bloor St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Location
- 43.67040, -79.38723
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
9These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Top 8Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 6 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 5 | 4 | 27 May 2013 |
| Ward 5 Etobicoke-Lakeshore | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 20 December 2010 |
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 16 December 2010 |
| Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 16 December 2010 |
| Ward 11 University-Rosedale | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 19 December 2018 |
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 16 December 2010 |
All registrations· 9 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM27123 | Kingsett Capital | 2 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 4 December 2018 – 31 August 2023 | 1 |
| SM20152 | Pattison Outdoor Advertising | 2 Bloor St. W | Signs | 5 March 2014 – 5 March 2015 | 0 |
| SM15547 | 2008221 Ontario Inc. | 2 Bloor Street West. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 10 December 2010 – 31 December 2012 | 4 |
| SM15744 | Oxford Properties Group | 2 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 1 December 2010 – 31 December 2013 | 3 |
| SM11804 | OPGI Management GP Inc. | 2 Bloor Street West | Planning Application, Zoning By-law | 26 May 2008 – 22 August 2014 | 3 |
| SM11735 | OPGI Management GP Inc. | 2 Bloor Street West | planning application - zoning | 12 May 2008 – 26 August 2011 | 0 |
| SM11757 | OPGI Management GP Inc. | 2 Bloor Street West | Planning application - zoning | 12 May 2008 – 23 July 2009 | 0 |
| SM11789 | Oxford Properties Group | 2 Bloor Street West | Planning Application - Zoning | 12 May 2008 – 20 October 2014 | 0 |
| SM11791 | Oxford Properties Group | 2 Bloor Street West | Planning Application - Zoning | 12 May 2008 – 20 October 2014 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
5- Submitted 14 December 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 248581 STE 11 SANOAC Issued · Approved
- Submitted 14 October 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 225968 STE 11 SANOAC Issued · Approved
- Submitted 7 September 2018Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 18 221948 STE 27 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 21 August 2014Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 14 210105 STE 27 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 27 June 2008Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 08 176116 STE 27 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 5 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 248581 STE 11 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 14 December 2021 | NOAC Issued Approved |
| 21 225968 STE 11 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 14 October 2021 | NOAC Issued Approved |
| 18 221948 STE 27 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 7 September 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 14 210105 STE 27 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 21 August 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 08 176116 STE 27 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 27 June 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
2 Bloor St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
08 176116 STE 27 OZ · submitted 27 June 2008 · Closed · from registration SM15744 (Oxford Properties Group)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM15744: regarding planning and development application (Zoning by-law)/Ontario Municipal Board Case No. PL100851 concerning property located at 2 Bloor Street West / Cumberland Terrace (Client: OPGI Management GP Inc) (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 176116 STE 27 OZ at 2 Bloor St W: Redevelopment of Cumberland Terrace for a mixed use building(s) containing an 35 storey and 45 storey mixed use residential commercial tower, 9 three storey "villas",commercial space, and accessory uses. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …ng and development application (Zoning by-law)/Ontario Municipal Board Case No. PL100851 concerning property located at 2 Bloor Street West / Cumberland Terrace (Client: OPGI Management GP Inc)
Matched fields
- address
- 2 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 2 BLOOR ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11
46 lobbied · 113 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 46 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 9% | 0.09 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 113 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.02 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11
69 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=10) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.