Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 08 149633 WET 02 OZ
5 Chapman Rd; 7 Chapman Rd; 9 Chapman Rd; 11 A Chapman Rd; 11 B Chapman Rd; 556 Scarlett Rd; 558A Scarlett Rd; 558B Scarlett Rd; 560A Scarlett Rd; 560B Scarlett Rd
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 21 April 2008
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 5 Chapman Rd; 7 Chapman Rd; 9 Chapman Rd; 11 A Chapman Rd; 11 B Chapman Rd; 556 Scarlett Rd; 558A Scarlett Rd; 558B Scarlett Rd; 560A Scarlett Rd; 560B Scarlett Rd
- Ward
- Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday
- Submitted
- 21 April 2008
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 10 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Six two storey detached residential units fronting on Chapman Road together with 1, two storey single detached and 2 two storey semi-detached dwellings fronting on Scarlett Road for a total of 10 residential dwellings. 3 addresses for this application are 556 and 558 Scarlett Road and Chapman Road
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Franton Homes · registration SM11526
Meeting to discuss changes to plans for zoning approval in light of Community Council refusal of previous plans for 558 Scarlett Road.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM11526: Meeting to discuss changes to plans for zoning approval in light of Community Council refusal of previous plans for 558 Scarlett Road. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 149633 WET 02 OZ at 556 Scarlett Rd: Six two storey detached residential units fronting on Chapman Road together with 1, two storey single detached and 2 two storey semi-detached dwellings fronting on Scarlett Road for a total of 10 residential dwellings. 3 addresses for this application are 556 and 558 Scarlett Road and Chapman Road (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Meeting to discuss changes to plans for zoning approval in light of Community Council refusal of previous plans for 558 Scarlett Road.
Matched fields
- address
- 558 SCARLETT RD
- application_address
- 558A SCARLETT RD
Franton Homes · registration SM11285
558 Scarlett Road, 13 Chapman Road
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.70
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM11285: 558 Scarlett Road, 13 Chapman Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 149633 WET 02 OZ at 556 Scarlett Rd: Six two storey detached residential units fronting on Chapman Road together with 1, two storey single detached and 2 two storey semi-detached dwellings fronting on Scarlett Road for a total of 10 residential dwellings. 3 addresses for this application are 556 and 558 Scarlett Road and Chapman Road (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 558 Scarlett Road, 13 Chapman Road
Matched fields
- address
- 558 SCARLETT RD
- application_address
- 558A SCARLETT RD
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 2
9 lobbied · 10 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 9 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.