Address · Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday
560A Scarlett Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday
- Location
- 43.68876, -79.51439
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 21 April 2008Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 08 149633 WET 02 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08 149633 WET 02 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 21 April 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
556 Scarlett Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
08 149633 WET 02 OZ · submitted 21 April 2008 · Closed · from registration SM11285 (Franton Homes)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.70
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM11285: 558 Scarlett Road, 13 Chapman Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 149633 WET 02 OZ at 556 Scarlett Rd: Six two storey detached residential units fronting on Chapman Road together with 1, two storey single detached and 2 two storey semi-detached dwellings fronting on Scarlett Road for a total of 10 residential dwellings. 3 addresses for this application are 556 and 558 Scarlett Road and Chapman Road (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 558 Scarlett Road, 13 Chapman Road
Matched fields
- address
- 558 SCARLETT RD
- application_address
- 558A SCARLETT RD
556 Scarlett Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
08 149633 WET 02 OZ · submitted 21 April 2008 · Closed · from registration SM11526 (Franton Homes)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM11526: Meeting to discuss changes to plans for zoning approval in light of Community Council refusal of previous plans for 558 Scarlett Road. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 149633 WET 02 OZ at 556 Scarlett Rd: Six two storey detached residential units fronting on Chapman Road together with 1, two storey single detached and 2 two storey semi-detached dwellings fronting on Scarlett Road for a total of 10 residential dwellings. 3 addresses for this application are 556 and 558 Scarlett Road and Chapman Road (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Meeting to discuss changes to plans for zoning approval in light of Community Council refusal of previous plans for 558 Scarlett Road.
Matched fields
- address
- 558 SCARLETT RD
- application_address
- 558A SCARLETT RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 2
9 lobbied · 10 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 9 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.