Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 08 145788 NNY 23 OZ
8 Inez Crt; 9 Inez Crt; 10 Inez Crt; 11 Inez Crt; 12 Inez Crt; 14 Inez Crt; 15 Inez Crt; 16 Inez Crt; 17 Inez Crt; 18 Inez Crt; 19 Inez Crt; 20 Inez Crt; 21 Inez Crt; 22 Inez Crt; 23 Inez Crt; 24 Inez Crt; 25 Inez Crt; 26 Inez Crt; 27 Inez Crt; 28 Inez Crt; 51 Drewry Ave; 51B Fairchild Ave
- Status
- OMB Appeal
- In progress
- Submitted
- 10 April 2008
- Appealed
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 8 Inez Crt; 9 Inez Crt; 10 Inez Crt; 11 Inez Crt; 12 Inez Crt; 14 Inez Crt; 15 Inez Crt; 16 Inez Crt; 17 Inez Crt; 18 Inez Crt; 19 Inez Crt; 20 Inez Crt; 21 Inez Crt; 22 Inez Crt; 23 Inez Crt; 24 Inez Crt; 25 Inez Crt; 26 Inez Crt; 27 Inez Crt; 28 Inez Crt; 51 Drewry Ave; 51B Fairchild Ave
- Ward
- Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
- Submitted
- 10 April 2008
- Status
- OMB Appeal
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- Yes
- Size stated in the description
- 551 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Revised submission implements modifications to the applications that were endorsed in principle by City Council during the spring and summer of 2014 in settlement of an outstanding Ontario Municipal Board (now Ontario Land Tribunal) appeals. The revised submission proposes two towers of 10 and 32-storeys connected via a 2-storey podium with a total of 551 residential units. A total of 672 parking spaces are proposed to be accommodated within a four-level underground parking garage. Vehicular access to the site is proposed via the future Beecroft Road extension. A 7,535.4 square metre public park is also proposed on the west side of the future public road.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Davies Howe Partners · registration SM14067
All necessary approvals for development of properties municipally known as 51 Drewry Avenue and 18-28 Inez Court
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM14067: All necessary approvals for development of properties municipally known as 51 Drewry Avenue and 18-28 Inez Court (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 145788 NNY 23 OZ at 18 Inez Crt: Revised submission implements modifications to the applications that were endorsed in principle by City Council during the spring and summer of 2014 in settlement of an outstanding Ontario Municipal Board (now Ontario Land Tribunal) appeals. The revised submission proposes two towers of 10 and 32-s… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: All necessary approvals for development of properties municipally known as 51 Drewry Avenue and 18-28 Inez Court
Matched fields
- address
- 51 DREWRY AVE
- application_address
- 51 DREWRY AVE
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 88 communications · 20 meetings · 4 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 4 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 23 Willowdale | Member of council | 47 | 18 | 8 August 2014 |
| John Filion | Councillor staff | 19 | 0 | 12 April 2022 |
| Ward 18 Willowdale | Member of council | 18 | 1 | 12 April 2022 |
| Office of Councillor John Filion, Ward 18 | Councillor staff | 4 | 1 | 13 June 2019 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18
37 lobbied · 63 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 24% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 63 | — | 64% (n=5) | 36% | 16% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.