Address · Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
27 Inez Crt
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
- Location
- 43.78538, -79.41864
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 10 April 2008Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 08 145788 NNY 23 OZOMB Appeal · In progress
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08 145788 NNY 23 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 10 April 2008 | OMB Appeal In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
18 Inez Crt · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
08 145788 NNY 23 OZ · submitted 10 April 2008 · OMB Appeal · from registration SM14067 (Davies Howe Partners)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM14067: All necessary approvals for development of properties municipally known as 51 Drewry Avenue and 18-28 Inez Court (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 145788 NNY 23 OZ at 18 Inez Crt: Revised submission implements modifications to the applications that were endorsed in principle by City Council during the spring and summer of 2014 in settlement of an outstanding Ontario Municipal Board (now Ontario Land Tribunal) appeals. The revised submission proposes two towers of 10 and 32-s… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: All necessary approvals for development of properties municipally known as 51 Drewry Avenue and 18-28 Inez Court
Matched fields
- address
- 51 DREWRY AVE
- application_address
- 51 DREWRY AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18
37 lobbied · 63 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 24% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 63 | — | 64% (n=5) | 36% | 16% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.