Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 08 111649 NNY 26 OZ
2 Sonic Way; 23 Sonic Way; 1185 Eglinton Ave E
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 14 February 2008
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 2 Sonic Way; 23 Sonic Way; 1185 Eglinton Ave E
- Ward
- Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
- Submitted
- 14 February 2008
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 639 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
This application is to permit the development of two apartment buildings 28 and 30 storeys in height and 26 townhouses for a total of 639 units and an FSI of 4.35 on the site of an existing office building and surface parking lot. The office building has been demolished. The applicant appealed to the OMB in May 2013 and a hearing is scheduled for November 3, 2013. North York Community Council considered a Directions Report at its meeting of September 10, 2013 and recommended approval subject to conditions.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Norma Walton · registration SM15304
1185 Eglinton Avenue East
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM15304: 1185 Eglinton Avenue East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 111649 NNY 26 OZ at 1185 Eglinton Ave E: This application is to permit the development of two apartment buildings 28 and 30 storeys in height and 26 townhouses for a total of 639 units and an FSI of 4.35 on the site of an existing office building and surface parking lot. The office building has been demolished. The applicant appealed to t… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1185 Eglinton Avenue East
Matched fields
- address
- 1185 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 1185 EGLINTON AVE E
Skyline 1185 Eglinton Avenue Inc. · registration SM11195
1185 Eglinton Avenue East
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM11195: 1185 Eglinton Avenue East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 111649 NNY 26 OZ at 1185 Eglinton Ave E: This application is to permit the development of two apartment buildings 28 and 30 storeys in height and 26 townhouses for a total of 639 units and an FSI of 4.35 on the site of an existing office building and surface parking lot. The office building has been demolished. The applicant appealed to t… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1185 Eglinton Avenue East
Matched fields
- address
- 1185 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 1185 EGLINTON AVE E
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 4 communications · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 26 Don Valley West | Member of council | 4 | 1 | 3 October 2013 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- LindvestSM26563 · 27 July 2018 · “1185 Eglinton Avenue East”
- Lindvest Properties LimitedSM26200 · 10 May 2018 · “1185 Eglinton Avenue East”
- Lindvest Properties LimitedSM25667 · 16 February 2018 · “1185 Eglinton Avenue East”
- Lindvest Properties LimitedSM23356 · 19 July 2016 · “1185 Eglinton Avenue East”
- Independent Order of ForestersSM19125 · 22 March 2013 · “1185 Eglinton Avenue East.”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 16
4 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.