Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise
81 Wellesley St E
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Location
- 43.66566, -79.38017
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
5These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 26 September 2013 |
All registrations· 5 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM30336 | Aragon Properties | 81 Wellesley Street East | Arts / Culture; Building Permits; Planning and Development | 15 July 2020 – 31 December 2025 | 0 |
| SM19678 | Aragon Properties | 81 Wellesley Street East | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 26 September 2013 – 31 December 2015 | 1 |
| SM19550 | Aragon Properties | 81 Wellesley Street East | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 30 July 2013 – 31 December 2015 | 0 |
| SM18242 | 1843758 Ontario Inc | 81 wellesley street east | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 9 August 2012 – 29 June 2013 | 0 |
| SM18283 | 1843758 Ontario Inc | 81 Wellesley Street East | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 20 July 2012 – 20 July 2016 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 30 December 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 252158 STE 13 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 23 January 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0075/17TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 4 November 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 247190 STE 27 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 23 August 2013Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 13 225676 STE 27 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 252158 STE 13 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 30 December 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0075/17TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 23 January 2017 | Closed Approved |
| 15 247190 STE 27 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 4 November 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 13 225676 STE 27 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 23 August 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
81 Wellesley St E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
15 247190 STE 27 SA · submitted 4 November 2015 · Closed · from registration SM19550 (Aragon Properties)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19550: 81 Wellesley Street East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 247190 STE 27 SA at 81 Wellesley St E: The proposed development consists of a 28-storey (88.7 metres, plus 7 metres mechanical) residential tower inclusive of a six-storey podium with grade-related commercial uses. A total of 179 residential units are proposed along with approximately 70 square metres (753 square feet) of grade-related … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 81 Wellesley Street East
Matched fields
- address
- 81 WELLESLEY ST E
- application_address
- 81 WELLESLEY ST E
81 Wellesley St E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
13 225676 STE 27 OZ · submitted 23 August 2013 · Closed · from registration SM19550 (Aragon Properties)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19550: 81 Wellesley Street East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 225676 STE 27 OZ at 81 Wellesley St E: Applications for an Official Plan Amendment and a Zoning By -Law Amendment to permit a 28 storey mixed use building, with a height of 95.7 m., comprising of 179 residential dwelling units with a total gross floor area of 14,821 sq.m. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 81 Wellesley Street East
Matched fields
- address
- 81 WELLESLEY ST E
- application_address
- 81 WELLESLEY ST E
81 Wellesley St E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
13 225676 STE 27 OZ · submitted 23 August 2013 · Closed · from registration SM19678 (Aragon Properties)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19678: 81 Wellesley Street East Rezoning application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 225676 STE 27 OZ at 81 Wellesley St E: Applications for an Official Plan Amendment and a Zoning By -Law Amendment to permit a 28 storey mixed use building, with a height of 95.7 m., comprising of 179 residential dwelling units with a total gross floor area of 14,821 sq.m. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 81 Wellesley Street East Rezoning application
Matched fields
- address
- 81 WELLESLEY ST E
- application_address
- 81 WELLESLEY ST E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13
4 lobbied · 23 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 23 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 13
5 lobbied · 76 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 76 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13
56 lobbied · 128 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 56 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 7% | 0.16 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 128 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 2% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
82 lobbied · 96 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 82 | — | 100% (n=13) | 0% | 11% | 0.15 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 96 | — | 90% (n=14) | 10% | 16% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.