Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)

Committee of Adjustment application A0075/17TEY

Ward 13 · Chris MoiseDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Approved
Submitted: 23 January 2017; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Minor variance (MV)
Addresses: 81 Wellesley St E
Ward: Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Submitted: 23 January 2017
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Approved
Hearing date: 30 May 2017
Decision: Approved
Objection at the hearing: Yes
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

To modify the development scheme for a 28-storey, mixed-use building approved under the Site Specific By-law approved by the OMB (PL140555), February 17, 2016, by reducing the required number of parking spaces.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Aragon Properties
SM30336 · 15 July 2020 · “81 Wellesley Street East”
Aragon Properties
SM19678 · 26 September 2013 · “81 Wellesley Street East”
Aragon Properties
SM19550 · 30 July 2013 · “81 Wellesley Street East”
1843758 Ontario Inc
SM18242 · 9 August 2012 · “81 wellesley street east”
1843758 Ontario Inc
SM18283 · 20 July 2012 · “81 Wellesley Street East”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 13

5 lobbied · 76 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 13: 5 lobbied and 76 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	5	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	76	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.